Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25479823›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2015

The precedence effect in sound localization.

Andrew D Brown, G Christopher Stecker, Daniel J Tollin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Speech versus noise in pediatric sound localization.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Role of the Dorsal Cortex of the Inferior Colliculus in the Precedence Effect.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  7. Sufficiency of ITD for (biased) human auditory azimuthal perception.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  8. Monaural and dichotic forward masking in the dolphin's auditory system.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Time scales of adaptation to context in horizontal sound localization.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Adaptation in auditory processing.Physiological reviews · 2023
    Review
  13. Head movement and its relation to hearing.Frontiers in psychology · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Spatial release from masking in reverberation for school-age children.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2021
    Article
  16. The dual benefits of synchronized mating signals in a Japanese treefrog: attracting mates and manipulating predators.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  17. High-resolution temporal weighting of interaural time differences in speech.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrew D BrownDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA, andrew.d.brown@ucdenver.edu.
G Christopher Stecker
Daniel J Tollin

Funding

Developmental effects of early hearing loss on auditory information processingR01DC011555 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI KLUG, ACHIM, TOLLIN, DANIEL J · 2012 to 2021
$4.4M
Temporal weighting of auditory spatial cuesR01DC011548 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI STECKER, GEORGE CHRISTOPHER · 2011 to 2015
$1.9M
Behavioral and Physiological Effects of Binaural Cue DistortionF32DC013927 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI BROWN, ANDREW DENNIS · 2014 to 2016
$169k
NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC013927NIDCD NIH HHS F32-DC013927NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011548NIDCD NIH HHS R01-DC011548NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011555NIDCD NIH HHS R01-DC011555
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In ordinary listening environments, acoustic signals reaching the ears directly from real sound sources are followed after a few milliseconds by early reflections arriving from nearby surfaces. Early reflections are spectrotemporally similar to their source signals but commonly carry spatial acoustic cues unrelated to the source location. Humans and many other animals, including nonmammalian and even invertebrate animals, are nonetheless able to effectively localize sound sources in such environments, even in the absence of disambiguating visual cues. Robust source localization despite concurrent or nearly concurrent spurious spatial acoustic information is commonly attributed to an assortment of perceptual phenomena collectively termed "the precedence effect," characterizing the perceptual dominance of spatial information carried by the first-arriving signal. Here, we highlight recent progress and changes in the understanding of the precedence effect and related phenomena.

Indexed as

PsychoacousticsSound LocalizationAnimalsHumans

Identifiers

PMID25479823
PMCPMC4310855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.