Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25479736›Full record

Trial reportExperimental brain research2015

Cognitive effects and autonomic responses to transcranial pulsed current stimulation.

Leon Morales-Quezada, Camila Cosmo, Sandra Carvalho, Jorge Leite, Laura Castillo-Saavedra, Joanna R Rozisky, Felipe Fregni

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Experimental brain research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06775145 (Therapeutic Effect of Neuromodulation on Anxiety Disorders by High-Definition Transcranial Electrical Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06775145 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Therapeutic Effect of Neuromodulation on Anxiety Disorders by High-Definition Transcranial Electrical Stimulation

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Taiwan University HospitalRan2025 to 2025Enrolled100ConditionsGeneralized Anxiety Disorder (GAD)ArmsHD-R_cDC+cTBS & sham-L_aDC+iTBS, sham-R_cDC+cTBS & HD-L_aDC+iTBS, HD-R_cDC+cTBS & HD-L_aDC+iTBS, sham-R_cDC+cTBS & sham-L_aDC+iTBS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Effect of Transcranial Pulsed Current Stimulation on Fatigue Delay after Medium-Intensity Training.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Leon Morales-QuezadaSpaulding Neuromodulation Center, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 79/96 13th Street, Charlestown, Boston, MA, USA.
Camila Cosmo
Sandra Carvalho
Jorge Leite
Laura Castillo-Saavedra
Joanna R Rozisky
Felipe Fregni
Harvard University · USSpaulding Rehabilitation Hospital · USUniversity of Minho · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcranial pulsed current stimulation (tPCS) is emerging as an option in the field of neuromodulation; however, little is known about its effects on cognition and behavior and its neurophysiological correlates as indexed by autonomic responses. Our aim was to identify the effects of tPCS on arithmetic processing and risk-taking behavior, and to further categorize physiological autonomic responses by heart rate variability (HRV) and electrodermal activity measurements before, during, and after exposure to task performance and stimulation. Thirty healthy volunteers were randomized to receive a single session of sham or active stimulation with a current intensity of 2 mA and a random frequency between 1 and 5 Hz. Our results showed that tPCS has a modest and specific effect on cognitive performance as indexed by the cognitive tasks chosen in this study. There was a modest effect of active tPCS only on performance facilitation on a complex-level mathematical task as compared to sham stimulation. On autonomic responses, we observed that HRV total power increased while LF/HF ratio decreased in the tPCS active group compared to sham. There were no group differences for adverse effects. Based on our results, we conclude that tPCS, in healthy subjects, has a modest and specific cognitive effect as shown by the facilitation of arithmetical processing on complex mathematical task. These effects are accompanied by modulation of the central autonomic network providing sympathetic-vagal balance during stressful conditions. Although behavioral results were modest, they contribute to the understanding of tPCS effects and cognitive enhancement.

Indexed as

AdultAttentionAutonomic Nervous SystemCognitionDecision MakingDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGalvanic Skin ResponseHeart RateHumansMaleNeuropsychological TestsProblem SolvingReaction TimeTranscranial Direct Current StimulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25479736
OpenAlexW2031729317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.