SynthesisPloS one2014
The effectiveness of teleglaucoma versus in-patient examination for glaucoma screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 56 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 133 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic accuracy of teleretinal screening for detection of diabetic retinopathy and age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2022Pooled it
- Knowledge Update on the Economic Evaluation of Pacemaker Telemonitoring Systems.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- Telemedicine in the OECD: An umbrella review of clinical and cost-effectiveness, patient experience and implementation.PloS one · 2020Pooled it
- Early Detection of Glaucoma and Diabetic Retinopathy in Low-Resource Settings: Barriers and Solutions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Review
- Development of deep learning model to screen for primary open-angle glaucoma in African ancestry individuals.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Advancements in AI-based quantitative analysis of fundus tessellation and its application in myopia research.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Glaucoma Surgery During Non-Pandemic vs. Pandemic Periods in a Tertiary Center in Romania.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Lights and Shadows on Artificial Intelligence in Glaucoma: Transforming Screening, Monitoring, and Prognosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Performance of the MOLES and TFSOM-DIM scores in classifying choroidal nevi and melanoma.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The value of virtual glaucoma clinics: a review.Eye (London, England) · 2024Review
- Teleophthalmology and retina: a review of current tools, pathways and services.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2023Review
- A technological approach to "Reaching the Unreached" - Leveraging teleophthalmology services in Rural Gujarat.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- The current use of glaucoma virtual clinics in Europe.Eye (London, England) · 2023Article
- Teleophthalmology Using Remote Retinal Imaging During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2023Article
- The Role of Telemedicine in Glaucoma Care Triggered by the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Article
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning in ophthalmology: A review.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2023Review
- Telemedicine and delivery of ophthalmic care in rural and remote communities: Drawing from Australian experience.Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrection: The effectiveness of teleglaucoma versus in-patient examination for glaucoma screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.2015 · Jeyaraman, Maya [corrected to Jeyaraman, Maya M]
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible visual impairment in the world affecting 60.5 million people worldwide in 2010, which is expected to increase to approximately 79.6 million by 2020. Therefore, glaucoma screening is important to detect, diagnose, and treat patients at the earlier stages to prevent disease progression and vision loss. Teleglaucoma uses stereoscopic digital imaging to take ocular images, which are transmitted electronically to an ocular specialist. The purpose is to synthesize literature to evaluate teleglaucoma, its diagnostic accuracy, healthcare system benefits, and cost-effectiveness.
methodsA systematic search was conducted to help locate published and unpublished studies. Studies which evaluate teleglaucoma as a screening device for glaucoma were included. A meta-analysis was conducted to provide estimates of diagnostic accuracy, diagnostic odds ratio, and the relative percentage of glaucoma cases detected. The improvements to healthcare service quality and cost data were assessed.
resultsOf 11237 studies reviewed, 45 were included. Our results indicated that, teleglaucoma is more specific and less sensitive than in-person examination. The pooled estimates of sensitivity was 0.832 [95% CI 0.770, 0.881] and specificity was 0.790 [95% CI 0.668, 0.876]. The relative odds of a positive screen test in glaucoma cases are 18.7 times more likely than a negative screen test in a non-glaucoma cases. Additionally, the mean cost for every case of glaucoma detected was $1098.67 US and of teleglaucoma per patient screened was $922.77 US.
conclusionTeleglaucoma can accurately discriminate between screen test results with greater odds for positive cases. It detects more cases of glaucoma than in-person examination. Both patients and the healthcare systems benefit from early detection, reduction in wait and travel times, increased specialist referral rates, and cost savings. Teleglaucoma is an effective screening tool for glaucoma specifically for remote and under-services communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.