Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25479584›Full record

Trial reportPancreas2015

Impact of prior chemotherapy use on the efficacy of everolimus in patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a subgroup analysis of the phase III RADIANT-3 trial.

Catherine Lombard-Bohas, James C Yao, Timothy Hobday, Eric Van Cutsem, Edward M Wolin, Ashok Panneerselvam, Sotirios Stergiopoulos, Manisha H Shah, Jaume Capdevila, Rodney Pommier

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pancreas, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Molecular Genetic Studies of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: New Therapeutic Approaches.Endocrinology and metabolism clinics of North America · 2018
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Catherine Lombard-BohasFrom the *Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; †Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; ‡Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN; §Digestive Oncology, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg/Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; ∥Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; ¶Department of Oncology Biometrics and Data, and #Department of Oncology, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ; **Department of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; ††Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; and ‡‡Division of Surgical Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
James C Yao
Timothy Hobday
Eric Van Cutsem
Edward M Wolin
Ashok Panneerselvam
Sotirios Stergiopoulos
Manisha H Shah
Jaume Capdevila
Rodney Pommier
The Ohio State University · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USMayo Clinic · USNovartis (Switzerland) · CHOregon Health & Science University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USTris Pharma (United States) · USVall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of everolimus in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET) by prior chemotherapy use in the RAD001 in Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors, Third Trial (RADIANT-3).

methodsPatients with advanced, progressive, low- or intermediate-grade pNET were prospectively stratified by prior chemotherapy use and World Health Organization performance status and were randomly assigned (1:1) to everolimus 10 mg/d (n = 207) or placebo (n = 203).

resultsOf the 410 patients, 204 (50%) were naive to chemotherapy (chemonaive). Baseline characteristics were similar for patients with or without prior chemotherapy. Everolimus significantly prolonged median progression-free survival regardless of prior chemotherapy use (prior chemotherapy: 11.0 vs 3.2 months; hazard ratio, 0.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.48; P < 0.0001) (chemonaive: 11.4 vs 5.4 months; hazard ratio, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.60; P < 0.0001). Stable disease was the best overall response in 73% of everolimus-treated patients (151/207). The most common drug-related adverse events included stomatitis (60%-69%), rash (47%-50%), and diarrhea (34%).

conclusionsAs more treatment options become available, it is important to consider the goals of treatment and to identify patients who would potentially benefit from a specific therapy. Findings from this planned subgroup analysis suggest the potential for first-line use of everolimus in patients with advanced pNET.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsDisease-Free SurvivalDisease ProgressionDouble-Blind MethodEverolimusFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNeuroendocrine TumorsPancreatic NeoplasmsPatient SelectionAntineoplastic AgentsEverolimus

Identifiers

PMID25479584
PMCPMC4327560
OpenAlexW2060122062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.