Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25479324›Full record

Trial reportSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2014

Evoked EMG versus muscle torque during fatiguing functional electrical stimulation-evoked muscle contractions and short-term recovery in individuals with spinal cord injury.

Eduardo H Estigoni, Che Fornusek, Nur Azah Hamzaid, Nazirah Hasnan, Richard M Smith, Glen M Davis

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Investigation of different stimulation patterns with doublet pulses to reduce muscle fatigue.Journal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Eduardo H EstigoniClinical Exercise and Rehabilitation Unit, Exercise Health and Performance, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Lidcombe, 2006 NSW, Australia. ehestigoni@yahoo.com.br.
Che FornusekClinical Exercise and Rehabilitation Unit, Exercise Health and Performance, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Lidcombe, 2006 NSW, Australia. che.fornusek@sydney.edu.au.
Nur Azah HamzaidClinical Exercise and Rehabilitation Unit, Exercise Health and Performance, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Lidcombe, 2006 NSW, Australia. azah.hamzaid@um.edu.my.
Nazirah HasnanClinical Exercise and Rehabilitation Unit, Exercise Health and Performance, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Lidcombe, 2006 NSW, Australia. nazirah@um.edu.my.
Richard M SmithClinical Exercise and Rehabilitation Unit, Exercise Health and Performance, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Lidcombe, 2006 NSW, Australia. richard.smith@sydney.edu.au.
Glen M DavisClinical Exercise and Rehabilitation Unit, Exercise Health and Performance, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Lidcombe, 2006 NSW, Australia. glen.davis@sydney.edu.au.
The University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated whether the relationship between muscle torque and m-waves remained constant after short recovery periods, between repeated intervals of isometric muscle contractions induced by functional electrical stimulation (FES). Eight subjects with spinal cord injury (SCI) were recruited for the study. All subjects had their quadriceps muscles group stimulated during three sessions of isometric contractions separated by 5 min of recovery. The evoked-electromyographic (eEMG) signals, as well as the produced torque, were synchronously acquired during the contractions and during short FES bursts applied during the recovery intervals. All analysed m-wave variables changed progressively throughout the three contractions, even though the same muscle torque was generated. The peak to peak amplitude (PtpA), and the m-wave area (Area) were significantly increased, while the time between the stimulus artefact and the positive peak (PosT) were substantially reduced when the muscles became fatigued. In addition, all m-wave variables recovered faster and to a greater extent than did torque after the recovery intervals. We concluded that rapid recovery intervals between FES-evoked exercise sessions can radically interfere in the use of m-waves as a proxy for torque estimation in individuals with SCI. This needs to be further investigated, in addition to seeking a better understanding of the mechanisms of muscle fatigue and recovery.

Indexed as

Isometric ContractionMuscle FatigueRecovery of FunctionAlgorithmsElectric Stimulation TherapyElectromyographyHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle StrengthReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySpinal Cord InjuriesTorque

Identifiers

PMID25479324
PMCPMC4299045
OpenAlexW2106222003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.