Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25479140›Full record

ArticleGastroenterology2015

Prevalence of germline mutations in cancer predisposition genes in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Robert C Grant, Iris Selander, Ashton A Connor, Shamini Selvarajah, Ayelet Borgida, Laurent Briollais, Gloria M Petersen, Jordan Lerner-Ellis, Spring Holter, Steven Gallinger

Open access · greenAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 156 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
156citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

156 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 295 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. SEOM-GETTHI clinical guideline for the practical management of molecular platforms (2021).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2022
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Guideline
  7. Mutations in the pancreatic secretory enzymesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. SEOM‑GETTHI clinical guideline for the practical management of molecular platforms (update 2026).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Research progress in diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer with mismatch repair and microsatellite instability.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. DNA Damage and Repair in Pancreatic Cancer-The Latest Findings.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

96 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Robert C GrantOntario Institute for Cancer Research, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada.
Iris SelanderLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Canada.
Ashton A ConnorDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Canada.
Shamini SelvarajahLaboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Canada.
Ayelet BorgidaLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Canada.
Laurent BriollaisLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Canada.
Gloria M PetersenDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Jordan Lerner-EllisOntario Institute for Cancer Research, Canada; Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Canada; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Canada.
Spring HolterLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Canada.
Steven GallingerOntario Institute for Cancer Research, Canada; Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Canada; Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Canada. Electronic address: steven.gallinger@uhn.on.ca.
Mount Sinai Hospital · CAResearch Canada · CAUniversity of Toronto · CALunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute · CAMayo Clinic in Florida · USOntario Institute for Cancer Research · CA

Funding

Tissue CoreP50CA102701 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI PETERSEN, GLORIA M. · 2004 to 2018
$32.7M
Pancreatic Cancer Genetic Epidemiology Consortium (PACGENE)R01CA097075 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI PETERSEN, GLORIA M. · 2002 to 2012
$15.8M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA102701NCI NIH HHS R01 CA097075NCI NIH HHS R01CA97075
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsWe investigated the prevalence of germline mutations in APC, ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CDKN2A, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PALB2, PMS2, PRSS1, STK11, and TP53 in patients with pancreatic cancer.

methodsThe Ontario Pancreas Cancer Study enrolls consenting participants with pancreatic cancer from a province-wide electronic pathology database; 708 probands were enrolled from April 2003 through August 2012. To improve the precision of BRCA2 prevalence estimates, 290 probands were selected from 3 strata, based on family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer, pancreatic cancer, or neither. Germline DNA was analyzed by next-generation sequencing using a custom multiple-gene panel. Mutation prevalence estimates were calculated from the sample for the entire cohort.

resultsEleven pathogenic mutations were identified: 3 in ATM, 1 in BRCA1, 2 in BRCA2, 1 in MLH1, 2 in MSH2, 1 in MSH6, and 1 in TP53. The prevalence of mutations in all 13 genes was 3.8% (95% confidence interval, 2.1%-5.6%). Carrier status was associated significantly with breast cancer in the proband or first-degree relative (P < .01), and with colorectal cancer in the proband or first-degree relative (P < .01), but not family history of pancreatic cancer, age at diagnosis, or stage at diagnosis. Of patients with a personal or family history of breast and colorectal cancer, 10.7% (95% confidence interval, 4.4%-17.0%) and 11.1% (95% confidence interval, 3.0%-19.1%) carried pathogenic mutations, respectively.

conclusionsA small but clinically important proportion of pancreatic cancer is associated with mutations in known predisposition genes. The heterogeneity of mutations identified in this study shows the value of using a multiple-gene panel in pancreatic cancer.

Indexed as

Esophageal AchalasiaGenes, NeoplasmHepatitis, AlcoholicHumansLiver TransplantationNitric Oxide Synthase Type INon-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseasePancreatic NeoplasmsNitric Oxide Synthase Type INOS1 protein, humanCancer RiskFamilial Pancreatic CancerPancreatic Cancer Genetics

Identifiers

PMID25479140
PMCPMC4339623
OpenAlexW2147918436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.