Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25478967›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

FindFoci: a focus detection algorithm with automated parameter training that closely matches human assignments, reduces human inconsistencies and increases speed of analysis.

Alex D Herbert, Antony M Carr, Eva Hoffmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. ALS Mutations Shift the Isoelectric Point of the KIF5A C Terminal Inducing Protein Aggregation and TDP-43 Mislocalization.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. CaCommunications biology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alex D HerbertMRC Genome Damage and Stability Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9RQ, United Kingdom.
Antony M CarrMRC Genome Damage and Stability Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9RQ, United Kingdom.
Eva HoffmannMRC Genome Damage and Stability Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9RQ, United Kingdom.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0902043Medical Research Council G1100074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate and reproducible quantification of the accumulation of proteins into foci in cells is essential for data interpretation and for biological inferences. To improve reproducibility, much emphasis has been placed on the preparation of samples, but less attention has been given to reporting and standardizing the quantification of foci. The current standard to quantitate foci in open-source software is to manually determine a range of parameters based on the outcome of one or a few representative images and then apply the parameter combination to the analysis of a larger dataset. Here, we demonstrate the power and utility of using machine learning to train a new algorithm (FindFoci) to determine optimal parameters. FindFoci closely matches human assignments and allows rapid automated exploration of parameter space. Thus, individuals can train the algorithm to mirror their own assignments and then automate focus counting using the same parameters across a large number of images. Using the training algorithm to match human assignments of foci, we demonstrate that applying an optimal parameter combination from a single image is not broadly applicable to analysis of other images scored by the same experimenter or by other experimenters. Our analysis thus reveals wide variation in human assignment of foci and their quantification. To overcome this, we developed training on multiple images, which reduces the inconsistency of using a single or a few images to set parameters for focus detection. FindFoci is provided as an open-source plugin for ImageJ.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDNA-Binding ProteinsFungal ProteinsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedProteinsReproducibility of ResultsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSoftwareUbiquitin-Protein LigasesDNA-Binding ProteinsFungal ProteinsMSH4 protein, S cerevisiaeProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsUbiquitin-Protein LigasesZip3 protein, S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID25478967
PMCPMC4257716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.