Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25478954›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Association between diabetes mellitus and tuberculosis in United States-born and foreign-born populations in San Francisco.

Gompol Suwanpimolkul, Jennifer A Grinsdale, Leah G Jarlsberg, Julie Higashi, Dennis H Osmond, Philip C Hopewell, Midori Kato-Maeda

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Diabetes Mellitus and Latent Tuberculosis Infection: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2017
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Diabetes mellitus and tuberculosis: programmatic management issues.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gompol SuwanpimolkulCurry International Tuberculosis Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America; Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand.
Jennifer A GrinsdaleTuberculosis Control, San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Leah G JarlsbergCurry International Tuberculosis Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Julie HigashiTuberculosis Control, San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Dennis H OsmondDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Philip C HopewellCurry International Tuberculosis Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Midori Kato-MaedaCurry International Tuberculosis Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
University of California, San Francisco · USSan Francisco Department of Public Health · US

Funding

POPULATION-BASED MOLECULAR EPIDEMIOLOGY OF TUBERCULOSISR01AI034238 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HOPEWELL, PHILIP C · 1993 to 2010
$9.3M
NIAID NIH HHS AI034238NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI034238
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

settingThe impact of diabetes on tuberculosis in United States and foreign-born populations in San Francisco has not been studied.

objectiveTo determine the characteristics, prevalence and temporal trends of diabetes in US and foreign-born persons attending the San Francisco Tuberculosis Clinic.

designWe analyzed data from individuals seeking medical attention at the San Francisco Tuberculosis Clinic. We included patients with diagnosis of tuberculosis, latent infection, or not infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. We assessed the temporal trend and the characteristics of individuals with and without diabetes.

resultBetween 2005 and 2012, there were 4371 (19.0%) individuals without evidence of tuberculosis infection, 17,856 (77.6%) with latent tuberculosis, and 791 (3.4%) with tuberculosis. 66% were born in the United States, China, Mexico, and the Philippines. The prevalence of diabetes was the highest among individuals with tuberculosis and increased during the study period. Patients with tuberculosis and diabetes were more likely to be male, older than 45 years and born in the Philippines. There was a disproportionate association of TB and DM relative to LTBI and DM among Filipinos in individuals older than 45 years old.

conclusionsOur data suggest that Filipinos older than 45 years old are more likely to have tuberculosis probably due to a higher prevalence of diabetes. In San Francisco, tuberculosis-screening programs in individuals with diabetes and latent tuberculosis may be beneficial in patients older than 45 years old especially from the Philippines.

Indexed as

Emigrants and ImmigrantsDiabetes MellitusFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceSan FranciscoTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID25478954
PMCPMC4257695
OpenAlexW1989735120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.