Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25478866›Full record

ArticleJournal of medicinal chemistry2015

Conformational analysis of the DFG-out kinase motif and biochemical profiling of structurally validated type II inhibitors.

R S K Vijayan, Peng He, Vivek Modi, Krisna C Duong-Ly, Haiching Ma, Jeffrey R Peterson, Roland L Dunbrack, Ronald M Levy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medicinal chemistry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 125 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
125citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

125 citing papers in PubMed, 233 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Positive selection screen identifies natural product β-catenin inactivators.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Tyrosine kinases sample unique activation ensembles.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

65 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

R S K VijayanCenter for Biophysics & Computational Biology and Institute for Computational Molecular Science, Temple University , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122, United States.
Peng He
Vivek Modi
Krisna C Duong-Ly
Haiching Ma
Jeffrey R Peterson
Roland L Dunbrack
Ronald M Levy
Fox Chase Cancer Center · USTemple University · USReaction Biology Corporation (United States) · US

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN CANCER RESEARCHT32CA009035 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI CHERNOFF, JONATHAN · 1985 to 2020
$10.5M
DYNAMICS OF PEPTIDES AND PROTEINSR01GM030580 · NIGMS · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI LEVY, RONALD · 1985 to 2018
$6.1M
Specificity of Effector Activation by Rho Family GTPasesR01GM083025 · NIGMS · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI PETERSON, JEFFREY R · 2008 to 2018
$3.2M
Bayesian Statistics and Algorithms for Homology ModelingR01GM084453 · NIGMS · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI DUNBRACK, ROLAND L · 2008 to 2016
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009035NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM030580NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM 083025NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083025NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM084453NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM30580NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM84453
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structural coverage of the human kinome has been steadily increasing over time. The structures provide valuable insights into the molecular basis of kinase function and also provide a foundation for understanding the mechanisms of kinase inhibitors. There are a large number of kinase structures in the PDB for which the Asp and Phe of the DFG motif on the activation loop swap positions, resulting in the formation of a new allosteric pocket. We refer to these structures as "classical DFG-out" conformations in order to distinguish them from conformations that have also been referred to as DFG-out in the literature but that do not have a fully formed allosteric pocket. We have completed a structural analysis of almost 200 small molecule inhibitors bound to classical DFG-out conformations; we find that they are recognized by both type I and type II inhibitors. In contrast, we find that nonclassical DFG-out conformations strongly select against type II inhibitors because these structures have not formed a large enough allosteric pocket to accommodate this type of binding mode. In the course of this study we discovered that the number of structurally validated type II inhibitors that can be found in the PDB and that are also represented in publicly available biochemical profiling studies of kinase inhibitors is very small. We have obtained new profiling results for several additional structurally validated type II inhibitors identified through our conformational analysis. Although the available profiling data for type II inhibitors is still much smaller than for type I inhibitors, a comparison of the two data sets supports the conclusion that type II inhibitors are more selective than type I. We comment on the possible contribution of the DFG-in to DFG-out conformational reorganization to the selectivity.

Indexed as

Amino Acid MotifsProtein ConformationAllosteric RegulationAllosteric SiteAmino Acid SequenceBiocatalysisDatabases, ProteinHumansModels, MolecularMolecular StructureProtein BindingProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein KinasesProtein Structure, TertiaryProteomeSmall Molecule LibrariesProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein KinasesProteomeSmall Molecule Libraries

Identifiers

PMID25478866
PMCPMC4326797
OpenAlexW1968427979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.