Trial reportPloS one2014
Agreement and reliability of tinnitus loudness matching and pitch likeness rating.
Trial report in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01541969 (Systematic Evaluation of the Acoustic CR ® Neuromodulation Treatment for Tinnitus), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Systematic Evaluation of the Acoustic CR ® Neuromodulation Treatment for Tinnitus
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effect of caffeine on tinnitus: Randomized triple-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial.PloS one · 2021Trial
- Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired with Tones for the Treatment of Tinnitus: A Prospective Randomized Double-blind Controlled Pilot Study in Humans.Scientific reports · 2017Trial
- The Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy versus Notched Sound Therapy in Adults with Chronic Subjective Tinnitus and Normal Hearing.International archives of otorhinolaryngology · 2024Article
- Current understanding of subjective tinnitus in adults.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024Review
- A cross-sectional study on predictors of patients' tinnitus severity.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2024Article
- Tinnitus in Children.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2024Review
- Comparison between two self-guided tinnitus pitch matching methods.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2023Article
- Automatic identification of tinnitus malingering based on overt and covert behavioral responses during psychoacoustic testing.NPJ digital medicine · 2022Article
- Multidisciplinary Tinnitus Research: Challenges and Future Directions From the Perspective of Early Stage Researchers.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2021Review
- Individual Reliability of the Standard Clinical Method vs Patient-Centered Tinnitus Likeness Rating for Assessment of Tinnitus Pitch and Loudness Matching.JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery · 2018Article
- Psychoacoustic Characteristics of Tinnitus versus Temporal Resolution in Subjects with Normal Hearing Sensitivity.International archives of otorhinolaryngology · 2017Article
- A State-of-the-Art Review: Personalization of Tinnitus Sound Therapy.Frontiers in psychology · 2017Review
- Does Tinnitus Depend on Time-of-Day? An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study with the "TrackYourTinnitus" Application.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2017Article
- Emotion dynamics and tinnitus: Daily life data from the "TrackYourTinnitus" application.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Psychometric properties of the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI): Assessment in a UK research volunteer population.Hearing research · 2016Article
- Emotional states as mediators between tinnitus loudness and tinnitus distress in daily life: Results from the "TrackYourTinnitus" application.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Can Animal Models Contribute to Understanding Tinnitus Heterogeneity in Humans?Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2016Review
- Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation induces oscillatory power changes in chronic tinnitus.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2015Article
- Hyperacusis Questionnaire as a Tool for Measuring Hypersensitivity to Sound in a Tinnitus Research Population.BioMed research international · 2015Article
- Comparing Three Established Methods for Tinnitus Pitch Matching With Respect to Reliability, Matching Duration, and Subjective Satisfaction.Trends in hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ability to reproducibly match tinnitus loudness and pitch is important to research and clinical management. Here we examine agreement and reliability of tinnitus loudness matching and pitch likeness ratings when using a computer-based method to measure the tinnitus spectrum and estimate a dominant tinnitus pitch, using tonal or narrowband sounds. Group level data indicated a significant effect of time between test session 1 and 2 for loudness matching, likely procedural or perceptual learning, which needs to be accounted in study design. Pitch likeness rating across multiple frequencies appeared inherently more variable and with no systematic effect of time. Dominant pitch estimates reached a level of clinical acceptability when sessions were spaced two weeks apart. However when dominant tinnitus pitch assessments were separated by three months, acceptable agreement was achieved only for group mean data, not for individual estimates. This has implications for prescription of some sound-based interventions that rely on accurate measures of individual dominant tinnitus pitch.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.