Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25477899›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2014

An efficient technique for Bayesian modeling of family data using the BUGS software.

Harold T Bae, Thomas T Perls, Paola Sebastiani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Harold T BaeSchool of Biological and Population Health Sciences, College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University Corvallis, OR, USA.
Thomas T PerlsNew England Centenarian Study, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine Boston, MA, USA.
Paola SebastianiDepartment of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Systems BiologyU19AG023122 · NIA · TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INST · PI JODI A LAPIDUS · 2004 to 2026
$102.6M
The Long Life Family StudyU01AG023755 · NIA · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI PERLS, THOMAS T · 2004 to 2018
$13.2M
Plasma beta-amyloid in long lived families: genetics and risk of ADU01AG023749 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI COSENTINO, STEPHANIE ANN, LEE, JOSEPH HYUNGWOO · 2004 to 2018
$13.0M
Interdisciplinary Training for BiostatisticiansT32GM074905 · NIGMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI WHITE, LAURA FORSBERG · 2005 to 2019
$3.0M
Effect of non genetic factors on genetic signatures of complex traitsR21HL114237 · NHLBI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI SEBASTIANI, PAOLA · 2012 to 2014
$480k
NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL114237NIA NIH HHS U01 AG023749NIA NIH HHS U01 AG023755NIA NIH HHS U19 AG023122NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM074905
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Linear mixed models have become a popular tool to analyze continuous data from family-based designs by using random effects that model the correlation of subjects from the same family. However, mixed models for family data are challenging to implement with the BUGS (Bayesian inference Using Gibbs Sampling) software because of the high-dimensional covariance matrix of the random effects. This paper describes an efficient parameterization that utilizes the singular value decomposition of the covariance matrix of random effects, includes the BUGS code for such implementation, and extends the parameterization to generalized linear mixed models. The implementation is evaluated using simulated data and an example from a large family-based study is presented with a comparison to other existing methods.

Indexed as

BUGScovariance matrixfamily-based studylinear mixed modelsparameterization

Identifiers

PMID25477899
PMCPMC4235415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.