Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25477779›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in molecular neuroscience2014

Putting a finishing touch on GECIs.

Tobias Rose, Pieter M Goltstein, Ruben Portugues, Oliver Griesbeck

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in molecular neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Precise calcium-to-spike inference using biophysical generative models.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. The Mechanism of LTXInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Spike rate inference from mouse spinal cord calcium imaging data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Aberrant hippocampal CabioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  14. TIME-VARYINGData science in science · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Astrocyte-specific CaBiochemistry and cell biology = Biochimie et biologie cellulaire · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tobias RoseMax-Planck-Institute of Neurobiology Martinsried, Germany.
Pieter M GoltsteinMax-Planck-Institute of Neurobiology Martinsried, Germany.
Ruben PortuguesMax-Planck-Institute of Neurobiology Martinsried, Germany.
Oliver GriesbeckMax-Planck-Institute of Neurobiology Martinsried, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

More than a decade ago genetically encoded calcium indicators (GECIs) entered the stage as new promising tools to image calcium dynamics and neuronal activity in living tissues and designated cell types in vivo. From a variety of initial designs two have emerged as promising prototypes for further optimization: FRET (Förster Resonance Energy Transfer)-based sensors and single fluorophore sensors of the GCaMP family. Recent efforts in structural analysis, engineering and screening have broken important performance thresholds in the latest generation for both classes. While these improvements have made GECIs a powerful means to perform physiology in living animals, a number of other aspects of sensor function deserve attention. These aspects include indicator linearity, toxicity and slow response kinetics. Furthermore creating high performance sensors with optically more favorable emission in red or infrared wavelengths as well as new stably or conditionally GECI-expressing animal lines are on the wish list. When the remaining issues are solved, imaging of GECIs will finally have crossed the last milestone, evolving from an initial promise into a fully matured technology.

Indexed as

bufferingcalciumfluorescent proteinFRETimagingneuronal activitysegmentation

Identifiers

PMID25477779
PMCPMC4235368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.