Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25477472›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Renal physiology2015

Hemodynamic basis for the limited renal injury in rats with angiotensin II-induced hypertension.

Aaron J Polichnowski, Karen A Griffin, Maria M Picken, Hector Licea-Vargas, Jianrui Long, Geoffrey A Williamson, Anil K Bidani

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physiology. Renal physiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Oxidative Stress in Kidney Injury and Hypertension.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Epithelial Cell Cycle Behaviour in the Injured Kidney.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    Corrigendum.2015 · Dosage error in published abstract; MEDLINE/PubMed abstract corrected; Dosage error in article text
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aaron J PolichnowskiHines Veterans Affairs Hospital and Department of Medicine Loyola University, Maywood, Illinois; Aaron.Polichnowski@va.gov.
Karen A GriffinHines Veterans Affairs Hospital and Department of Medicine Loyola University, Maywood, Illinois;
Maria M PickenDepartment of Pathology Loyola University, Maywood, Illinois.
Hector Licea-VargasHines Veterans Affairs Hospital and Department of Medicine Loyola University, Maywood, Illinois;
Jianrui LongDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois;
Geoffrey A WilliamsonDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois;
Anil K BidaniHines Veterans Affairs Hospital and Department of Medicine Loyola University, Maywood, Illinois;

Funding

PATHOLOGY OF HYPERTENSIVE INJURY IN REMNANT KIDNEYSR01DK040426 · NIDDK · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BIDANI, ANIL K · 1990 to 2011
$2.8M
Dynamic BP load and diabetic nephropathy phenotype.R01DK061653 · NIDDK · LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO · PI GRIFFIN, KAREN A. · 2002 to 2014
$2.1M
Nitric Oxide Deficiency in Hypertensive NephropathiesIK2BX001285 · VA · EDWARD HINES JR VA HOSPITAL · PI POLICHNOWSKI, AARON JAMES · 2011 to 2015
–
BLRD VA IK2 BX001285NIDDK NIH HHS DK-40426NIDDK NIH HHS DK-61653
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ANG II is thought to increase the susceptibility to hypertension-induced renal disease (HIRD) via blood pressure (BP)-dependent and BP-independent pathways; however, the quantitative relationships between BP and HIRD have not been examined in ANG II-infused hypertensive rats. We compared the relationship between radiotelemetrically measured BP and HIRD in Sprague-Dawley rats (Harlan) chronically administered ANG II (300-500 ng·kg(-1)·min(-1), n = 19) for 4 wk versus another commonly employed pharmacological model of hypertension induced by the chronic administration of N(ω)-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (l-NAME, 50 mg·kg(-1)·day(-1), n = 23). [DOSAGE ERROR CORRECTED]. Despite the significantly higher average systolic BP associated with ANG II (191.1 ± 3.2 mmHg) versus l-NAME (179.9 ± 2.5 mmHg) administration, the level of HIRD was very modest in the ANG II versus l-NAME model as evidenced by significantly less glomerular injury (6.6 ± 1.3% vs. 11.3 ± 1.5%, respectively), tubulointerstitial injury (0.3 ± 0.1 vs. 0.7 ± 0.1 injury score, respectively), proteinuria (66.3 ± 10.0 vs. 117.5 ± 10.1 mg/day, respectively), and serum creatinine levels (0.5 ± 0.04 vs. 0.9 ± 0.07 mg/dl, respectively). Given that HIRD severity is expected to be a function of renal microvascular BP transmission, BP-renal blood flow (RBF) relationships were examined in additional conscious rats administered ANG II (n = 7) or l-NAME (n = 8). Greater renal vasoconstriction was observed during ANG II versus l-NAME administration (41% vs. 23% decrease in RBF from baseline). Moreover, administration of ANG II, but not l-NAME, led to a unique BP-RBF pattern in which the most substantial decreases in RBF were observed during spontaneous increases in BP. We conclude that the hemodynamic effects of ANG II may mediate the strikingly low susceptibility to HIRD in the ANG II-infused model of hypertension in rats.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryAngiotensin IIAnimalsBlood PressureDisease Models, AnimalHemodynamicsHypertensionKidneyMaleRats, Sprague-DawleyRenal CirculationAngiotensin IIblood pressureNω-nitro-l-arginine methyl esterradiotelemetryrenal blood flow

Identifiers

PMID25477472
PMCPMC4312963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.