ArticleInternational immunology2015
Regulation of T cell development by c-Cbl: essential role of Lck.
Article in International immunology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Type of PaperY192 within the SH2 Domain of Lck Regulates TCR Signaling Downstream of PLC-γ1 and Thymic Selection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Identification of Candidate Genes Related to Inflammatory Bowel Disease Using Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance, Incremental Feature Selection, and the Shortest-Path Approach.BioMed research international · 2017Article
- T-cell development is regulated by the coordinated function of proximal and distal Lck promoters active at different developmental stages.European journal of immunology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A canonical pre-TCR/TCR signaling pathway critical for thymic T cell development involves sequential phosphorylation and signaling through Lck, Zap70, Lat and Slp76. However, we and others have previously reported that genomic deletion of c-Cbl (Cbl) partially or completely reverses the defects in thymic development in mice deficient in Zap70, Slp76, Lat or Vav1, indicating the presence of alternative pathways normally suppressed by Cbl. To further elucidate pre-TCR/TCR signaling pathways involved in thymic development, we characterized the effect of Cbl inactivation on developmental and signaling defects in mice deficient in proximal signaling molecules Lck and Zap70. Inactivation of Cbl partially reversed defective T cell development in Zap70 (-/-) mice and reversed defects in phosphorylation of Erk, Plc-γ1, Vav1 and Akt, in TCR-stimulated Cbl (-/-) Zap70 (-/-) thymocytes. Recent reports identified an essential role of Lck in associating with CD4 and CD8 coreceptors and mediating the requirement for MHC restriction in TCR recognition. Since TCR recognition has been shown to be MHC-restricted in Cbl (-/-) mice, it was of interest to determine whether the requirement for Lck remained unmodified by Cbl deletion. Indeed, in contrast to the effect of Cbl inactivation in partially or fully bypassing requirements for other TCR signaling components, inactivation of Cbl did not reverse either defective T cell development or defective phosphorylation of TCR signaling molecules in Lck (-/-) mice. Thus, Lck, which plays a unique role in enforcing MHC restriction, is essential for thymic development in presence or absence of Cbl, ensuring MHC restriction of T cells derived from either pathway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.