ArticleBiomaterials2015
VEGFR targeting leads to significantly enhanced tumor uptake of nanographene oxide in vivo.
Article in Biomaterials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Meta-Analysis of Nanoparticle Delivery to Tumors Using a Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulation Approach.ACS nano · 2020Pooled it
- Nanomedicine in Cancer Therapeutics: Current Perspectives from Bench to Bedside.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
- Advances in Molecular Imaging of VEGFRs: Innovations in Imaging and Therapeutics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Biomimetic Ghost Nanomedicine-Based Optotheranostics for Cancer.Nano letters · 2024Review
- Nanomedicine in cancer therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023Review
- Nanomedicine in therapeutic warfront against estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.Drug delivery and translational research · 2023Review
- Overcoming Vascular Barriers to Improve the Theranostic Outcomes of Nanomedicines.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022Review
- Applications of Pristine and Functionalized Carbon Nanotubes, Graphene, and Graphene Nanoribbons in Biomedicine.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Nanoparticles as a Tool in Neuro-Oncology Theranostics.Pharmaceutics · 2021Review
- The Use of Alternative Strategies for Enhanced Nanoparticle Delivery to Solid Tumors.Chemical reviews · 2021Review
- Nanotechnology for angiogenesis: opportunities and challenges.Chemical Society reviews · 2020Review
- Development of hydrophobic reduced graphene oxide as a new efficient approach for photochemotherapy.RSC advances · 2020Review
- Anticancer therapeutics: a brief account on wide refinements.American journal of cancer research · 2020Review
- Nanocomposites as biomolecules delivery agents in nanomedicine.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2019Review
- Optically Active Nanomaterials for Bioimaging and Targeted Therapy.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019Review
- In Vitro Cytotoxicity and Morphological Assessments of GO-ZnO against the MCF-7 Cells: Determination of Singlet Oxygen by Chemical Trapping.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- An In Vitro Study of the Photodynamic Effectiveness of GO-Ag Nanocomposites against Human Breast Cancer Cells.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Article
- Theranostic Probes for Targeting Tumor Microenvironment: An Overview.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017Review
- Positron emission tomography and nanotechnology: A dynamic duo for cancer theranostics.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2017Review
- Radio-graphene in Theranostic Perspectives.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although graphene oxide (GO) has recently been considered as a highly attractive nanomaterial for future cancer imaging and therapy, it is still a major challenge to improve its in vivo tumor active targeting efficiency. Here in this full article, we demonstrated the successful and significantly enhanced in vivo tumor vasculature targeting efficacy of well-functionalized GO nanoconjugates by using vascular endothelial growth factor 121 (VEGF121) as the targeting ligand. As-developed GO nanoconjugate exhibits excellent in vivo stability, specific in vitro and in vivo vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) targeting, significantly enhanced tumor accumulation (>8 %ID/g) as well as high tumor-to-muscle contrast, showing great potential for future tumor targeted imaging and therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.