Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25477140›Full record

SynthesisInternational urogynecology journal2015

Surgery for urinary incontinence in women 65 years and older: a systematic review.

Karin Franzen, Gunnel Andersson, Jenny Odeberg, Patrik Midlöv, Eva Samuelsson, Karin Stenzelius, Margareta Hammarström

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International urogynecology journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Are suburethral slings less successful in the elderly?International urogynecology journal · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Karin FranzenSchool of Medicine, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden, karin.m.franzen@oru.se.
Gunnel Andersson
Jenny Odeberg
Patrik Midlöv
Eva Samuelsson
Karin Stenzelius
Margareta Hammarström
Örebro University · SEKarolinska Institutet · SELund University · SEMalmö University · SESwedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care · SEUmeå University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisUrinary incontinence (UI) is common among the elderly, but the literature is sparse on the surgical treatment of UI among the elderly. This systematic review aims to assess the effectiveness of surgical interventions as treatment for urinary incontinence in the elderly population ≥65 years of age.

methodsRandomized controlled trials (RCT) and prospective nonrandomized studies (NRS) were included. The databases PubMed (NLM), EMBASE (Elsevier), Cochrane Library (Wiley), and Cinahl (EBSCO) were searched for the period 1966 up to October 2013. The population had to be ≥65 years of age and had to have undergone urethral sling procedures, periurethral injection of bulking agents, artificial urinary sphincter surgery, bladder injection treatment with onabotulinumtoxin A or sacral neuromodulation treatment. Eligible outcomes were episodes of incontinence/urine leakage, adverse events, and quality of life. The studies included had to be at a moderate or low risk of bias. Mean difference (MD) or standard mean difference (SMD)as well as risk difference (RD) and the 95% CI were calculated.

resultsFive studies--all on the suburethral sling procedure in women-- that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were identified. The proportion of patients reporting persistent SUI after surgery ranged from 5.2 to 17.6%. One study evaluating quality of life (QoL) showed a significant improvement after surgery. The complication rates varied between 1 and 26%, mainly bladder perforation, bladder emptying disturbances, and de novo urge.

conclusionThe suburethral sling procedure improves continence as well as QoL among elderly women with SUI; however, evidence is limited.

Indexed as

Suburethral SlingsAgedCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansProspective StudiesQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeUrinary Incontinence, Stress

Identifiers

PMID25477140
OpenAlexW1964732238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.