ArticlePsychological research2015
Spatial coding of object typical size: evidence for a SNARC-like effect.
Article in Psychological research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Mapping of non-numerical domains on space: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Experimental brain research · 2018Pooled it
- Changing speed along the mental line: A SNARC-like effect for visual acceleration.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Article
- Ace in the hole: playing cards show the role of order and magnitude in the SNARC effect.Psychological research · 2026Article
- Space-magnitude associations modulate the familiar-size stroop effect in visual size judgments.Psychological research · 2025Article
- Magnitude-space representations in the n-back task: Long-term representations of magnitudes alter the working memory performance.Memory & cognition · 2025Article
- A SNARC-like effect for visual speed.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025Article
- Number, size, and space associated in a common system by distinct mechanisms.Psychological research · 2024Article
- Beyond fixed sets: boundary conditions for obtaining SNARC-like effects with continuous semantic magnitudes.Psychological research · 2024Article
- Analogue magnitude representation of angles and its relation to geometric expertise.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- It's SNARC o' clock: manipulating the salience of the context in a conceptual replication of Bächtold et al.'s (1998) clockface study.Psychological research · 2024Article
- Magnitude shifts spatial attention from left to right in rhesus monkeys as in the human mental number line.iScience · 2024Article
- Observing ageism implicitly using the numerical parity judgment task.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- When time stands upright: STEARC effects along the vertical axis.Psychological research · 2023Article
- Is a boat bigger than a ship? Null results in the investigation of vowel sound symbolism on size judgements in real language.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2023Article
- Cognitive inhibition abilities explain inter-individual variability in gender-space associations.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- A systematic investigation reveals that Ishihara et al.'s (2008) STEARC effect only emerges when time is directly assessed.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- How emotional is a banknote? The affective basis of money perception.Psychological research · 2021Article
- The distance effect on discrimination ability and response bias during magnitude comparison in a go/no-go task.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2021Article
- Is 'heavy' up or down? Testing the vertical spatial representation of weight.Psychological research · 2021Article
- Exploring the Space-Calorie Association: Preliminary Evidence from Reaction Time Performance.Advances in cognitive psychology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study aimed to assess whether the representation of the typical size of objects can interact with response position codes in two-choice bimanual tasks, and give rise to a SNARC-like effect (faster responses when the representation of the typical size of the object to which the target stimulus refers corresponds to response side). Participants performed either a magnitude comparison task (in which they were required to judge whether the target was smaller or larger than a reference stimulus; Experiment 1) or a semantic decision task (in which they had to classify the target as belonging to either the category of living or non-living entities; Experiment 2). Target stimuli were pictures or written words referring to either typically large and small animals or inanimate objects. In both tasks, participants responded by pressing a left- or right-side button. Results showed that, regardless of the to-be-performed task (magnitude comparison or semantic decision) and stimulus format (picture or word), left responses were faster when the target represented typically small-sized entities, whereas right responses were faster for typically large-sized entities. These results provide evidence that the information about the typical size of objects is activated even if it is not requested by the task, and are consistent with the idea that objects' typical size is automatically spatially coded, as has been proposed to occur for number magnitudes. In this representation, small objects would be on the left and large objects would be on the right. Alternative interpretations of these results are also discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25476998What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.