Trial reportEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2015
Anterior stand-alone fusion revisited: a prospective clinical, X-ray and CT investigation.
Trial report in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- Is there a variance in complication types associated with ALIF approaches? A systematic review.Acta neurochirurgica · 2021Pooled it
- ALIF in the correction of spinal sagittal misalignment. A systematic review of literature.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2021Pooled it
- Cost-Effectiveness of 3D-Printed Patient-Specific Versus Off-the-Shelf Interbody Cages in Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Markov Model Cost-Utility Analysis.Journal of market access & health policy · 2026Article
- Article
- Clinical Outcomes of 3D-Printed Titanium Patient-Specific Implants in Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Clinical Trial with a Systematic Review of Conventional Techniques.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- One-stage posterior debridement approach combined with autogenous bone grafting and internal fixation for the treatment of adult thoracic or lumbar suppurative spondylitis via the multifidus and longissimus interspaces.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Review
- Outcomes and Spinopelvic Changes After Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With a Novel Interbody Fusion Device: A Retrospective Study.International journal of spine surgery · 2024Article
- Injectable bone cement cannulated pedicle screw for lumbar degenerative disease in osteoporosis - clinical follow-up of over 5 years.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Article
- Influences of lumbo-sacral transitional vertebrae for anterior lumbar interbody fusion.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Anterior Plate Fixation.Cureus · 2024Article
- Effects of anti-osteoporosis treatment in elderly patients with osteoporosis and lumbar discectomy and fusion.Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Comparison of predictive performance for cage subsidence between CT-based Hounsfield units and MRI-based vertebral bone quality score following oblique lumbar interbody fusion.European radiology · 2023Article
- Application of self-anchored lateral lumbar interbody fusion in lumbar degenerative diseases.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2023Article
- [Efficacy analysis of autologous facet joint bone block in lumbar interbody fusion of osteoporosis patients].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2023Article
- Simultaneous Single-Position Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery and Unilateral Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation for Spondylolisthesis.Neurospine · 2023Article
- Comparison of Long-Term Clinical and Radiographical Outcomes between the Anterior and Combined Anterior and Posterior Approaches for Treating Lumbosacral Tuberculosis.Orthopaedic surgery · 2023Article
- Computational comparison of anterior lumbar interbody fusion and oblique lumbar interbody fusion with various supplementary fixation systems: a finite element analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Article
- Surgical strategy of lumbopelvic instrumentation in the treatment of lumbosacral tuberculosis: S2-alar-iliac screws vs iliac screws.International wound journal · 2022Article
- Albumin-to-Alkaline Phosphatase Ratio as a Prognostic Biomarker for Spinal Fusion in Lumbar Degenerative Diseases Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spinal Fusion.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Preoperative Lymphocyte to Monocyte Ratio as a Predictive Biomarker for Disease Severity and Spinal Fusion Failure in Lumbar Degenerative Diseases Patients Undergoing Lumbar Fusion.Journal of pain research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to assess the mid-term clinical and radiological results as well as patient safety in terms of complication and reoperation rates in patients treated with a novel anterior stand-alone fusion (ASAF) device (Synfix-LR, DePuy Synthes, West Chester, PA, USA) in a cohort of patients with predominant and intractable low back pain originating from monosegmental degenerative disc disease at the lumbosacral junction.
methodsClinical outcome scores visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI) and patient satisfaction rates were acquired within the framework of an ongoing single-center prospective clinical trial. Evaluation of radiological data included segmental and global lumbar lordosis, neuroforaminal height and width. Interbody fusion was assessed from post-operative CT scans. The minimum follow-up (FU) was 12 months.
results71 out of an initial 77 patients were available for final FU (92.2 % FU rate) after a mean FU of 35.1 months (range 12.0-85.5 months). The overall results revealed a highly significant improvement from baseline VAS and ODI levels (p < 0.0001). 77.5 % (n = 55/71) of all patients reported a 'highly satisfactory' (n = 37/71; 52.1 %) or a 'satisfactory' (n = 18/71; 25.4 %) outcome; 22.5 % of patients were not satisfied. The overall complication rate was 12.7 % (n = 9/71). Two cases required post-operative revision surgery (2.8 %). Radiographical analysis demonstrated a highly significant increase of segmental lordosis from 16.1° to 26.7° (p < 0.0001). A high rate of solid interbody fusion was confirmed in 97.3 % of all cases (n = 36/37).
conclusionThe current study delineates satisfactory clinical results following ASAF at the lumbosacral junction. Patient safety was demonstrated with acceptable complication and low reoperation rates. Radiological data demonstrated a significant reconstruction of lordosis at the lumbosacral junction. Solid interbody fusion was achieved in 97.3 % of all cases in a highly selected cohort with optimal predisposition for fusion. ASAF may serve to avoid a variety of negative side effects for a considerable number of patients which, otherwise, would have been candidates for posterior instrumented fusion techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.