ArticleBMC medical ethics2014
Ethical challenges in connection with the use of coercion: a focus group study of health care personnel in mental health care.
Article in BMC medical ethics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Potential Sources of Moral Injury for Healthcare Workers in Forensic and Psychiatric Settings: A Systematic Review and Meta-ethnography.Trauma, violence & abuse · 2024Pooled it
- Factors Associated with Perceived Coercion in Adults Receiving Psychiatric Care: A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Psychiatrists' experiences with the implementation of safewards and other quality improvement work: an explorative, qualitative interview study.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- Ethical Issues in Clinical Decision-Making about Involuntary Psychiatric Treatment: A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- "Some missions can be quite emotionally painful." Paramedic´s experience exercising coercion during assignments-A qualitative study.PloS one · 2024Article
- Two years of ethics reflection groups about coercion in psychiatry. Measuring variation within employees' normative attitudes, user involvement and the handling of disagreement.BMC medical ethics · 2023Article
- Sharing decisions amid uncertainties: a qualitative interview study of healthcare professionals' ethical challenges and norms regarding decision-making in gender-affirming medical care.BMC medical ethics · 2022Article
- Coercive Measures in Psychiatry: A Review of Ethical Arguments.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Review
- Implementing ethics reflection groups in hospitals: an action research study evaluating barriers and promotors.BMC medical ethics · 2019Article
- Illness and disease: an empirical-ethical viewpoint.BMC medical ethics · 2019Article
- Ethical challenges assessed in the clinical ethics Committee of Psychiatry in the region of Southern Denmark in 2010-2015: a qualitative content analyses.BMC medical ethics · 2018Article
- The significance of ethics reflection groups in mental health care: a focus group study among health care professionals.BMC medical ethics · 2018Article
- Staff's normative attitudes towards coercion: the role of moral doubt and professional context-a cross-sectional survey study.BMC medical ethics · 2017Article
- Does Moral Case Deliberation Help Professionals in Care for the Homeless in Dealing with Their Dilemmas? A Mixed-Methods Responsive Study.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2017Article
- Justifications for coercive care in child and adolescent psychiatry, a content analysis of medical documentation in Sweden.BMC health services research · 2016Article
- Dealing with ethical challenges: a focus group study with professionals in mental health care.BMC medical ethics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn recent years, the attention on the use of coercion in mental health care has increased. The use of coercion is common and controversial, and involves many complex ethical challenges. The research question in this study was: What kind of ethical challenges related to the use of coercion do health care practitioners face in their daily clinical work?
methodsWe conducted seven focus group interviews in three mental health care institutions involving 65 multidisciplinary participants from different clinical fields. The interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. We analysed the material applying a 'bricolage' approach. Basic ethical principles for research ethics were followed. We received permission from the hospitals' administrations and all health care professionals who participated in the focus group interviews.
resultsHealth care practitioners describe ethical dilemmas they face concerning formal, informal and perceived coercion. They provide a complex picture. They have to handle various ethical challenges, not seldom concerning questions of life and death. In every situation, the dignity of the patient is at stake when coercion is considered as morally right, as well as when coercion is not the preferred intervention. The work of the mental health professional is a complicated "moral enterprise". The ethical challenges deserve to be identified and handled in a systematic way. This is important for developing the quality of health care, and it is relevant to the current focus on reducing the use of coercion and increasing patient participation. Precise knowledge about ethical challenges is necessary for those who want to develop ethics support in mental health care. Better communication skills among health care professionals and improved therapeutic relationships seem to be vital.
conclusionsA systematic focus on ethical challenges when dealing with coercion is an important step forward in order to improve health care in the mental health field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.