Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25475875›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2014

A framework for modelling gene regulation which accommodates non-equilibrium mechanisms.

Tobias Ahsendorf, Felix Wong, Roland Eils, Jeremy Gunawardena

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Seeing with an extra sense.Current biology : CB · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Energy Aware Technology Mapping of Genetic Logic Circuits.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  6. The Hill function is the universal Hopfield barrier for sharpness of input-output responses.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Eukaryotic gene regulation at equilibrium, or non?Current opinion in systems biology · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Frontiers in genetics · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tobias AhsendorfDKFZ, Heidelberg, D-69120, Germany. tobias.ahsendorf@googlemail.com.
Felix WongHarvard College, Cambridge, 02138, USA. fwong@college.harvard.edu.
Roland EilsDKFZ, Heidelberg, D-69120, Germany. r.eils@dkfz-heidelberg.de.
Jeremy GunawardenaDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, 200 Longwood Avenue, Boston, 02115, USA. jeremy@hms.harvard.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGene regulation has, for the most part, been quantitatively analysed by assuming that regulatory mechanisms operate at thermodynamic equilibrium. This formalism was originally developed to analyse the binding and unbinding of transcription factors from naked DNA in eubacteria. Although widely used, it has made it difficult to understand the role of energy-dissipating, epigenetic mechanisms, such as DNA methylation, nucleosome remodelling and post-translational modification of histones and co-regulators, which act together with transcription factors to regulate gene expression in eukaryotes.

resultsHere, we introduce a graph-based framework that can accommodate non-equilibrium mechanisms. A gene-regulatory system is described as a graph, which specifies the DNA microstates (vertices), the transitions between microstates (edges) and the transition rates (edge labels). The graph yields a stochastic master equation for how microstate probabilities change over time. We show that this framework has broad scope by providing new insights into three very different ad hoc models, of steroid-hormone responsive genes, of inherently bounded chromatin domains and of the yeast PHO5 gene. We find, moreover, surprising complexity in the regulation of PHO5, which has not yet been experimentally explored, and we show that this complexity is an inherent feature of being away from equilibrium. At equilibrium, microstate probabilities do not depend on how a microstate is reached but, away from equilibrium, each path to a microstate can contribute to its steady-state probability. Systems that are far from equilibrium thereby become dependent on history and the resulting complexity is a fundamental challenge. To begin addressing this, we introduce a graph-based concept of independence, which can be applied to sub-systems that are far from equilibrium, and prove that history-dependent complexity can be circumvented when sub-systems operate independently.

conclusionsAs epigenomic data become increasingly available, we anticipate that gene function will come to be represented by graphs, as gene structure has been represented by sequences, and that the methods introduced here will provide a broader foundation for understanding how genes work.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, FungalModels, MolecularAcid PhosphataseDNADNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsThermodynamicsTranscription FactorsAcid PhosphataseDNAPHO5 protein, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID25475875
PMCPMC4288563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.