Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25475771›Full record

Trial reportMedicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal2015

Evaluation of osteoblastic activity in extraction sockets treated with platelet-rich fibrin.

Ozgur Baslarli, Celal Tumer, Omer Ugur, Betul Vatankulu

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Local interventions for the management of alveolar osteitis (dry socket).The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Application of platelet-rich fibrin on mandibular third molar extraction: systematic review and Meta-analysis.Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Does platelet-rich fibrin increase bone regeneration in mandibular third molar extraction sockets?Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Platelets and Their Pathways in Dentistry: Systematic Review.Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry · 2017
    Review
  20. Clinical and biological analysis in graftless maxillary sinus lift.Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ozgur BaslarliHacettepe University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral Surgery, 06100 Sihhiye, Ankara, Turkey, ozgurbaslarli@gmail.com.
Celal Tumer
Omer Ugur
Betul Vatankulu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to determine whether the use of platelet rich fibrin (PRF) improved the healing of extraction sockets. STUDY

designA total of 20 patients with bilateral soft tissue impacted mandibular third molars were included in this study. The left and right third molars were extracted during the same session. Subsequently, the PRF membrane was randomly administered to one of the extraction sockets, whereas the contralateral sockets were left without treatment. On postoperative 30. and 90. days, panoramic images and bone scintigrams were taken to evaluate the bone healing between PRF-treated and non-PRF-treated sockets. Also, periodontal evaluation was performed in the same control sessions. Dependent group t test for paired samples was used for statistical analysis.

resultsThe average increase in technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate uptake as an indication of enhanced bone healing did not differ significantly between PRF-treated and non-PRF-treated sockets 30 and 90 days postoperatively. Radio-opacity that can show the bone healing on panoramic images were measured by Image J programme and they did not differ significantly. Also periodontal values did not differ significantly.

conclusionsPRF might not lead to enhanced bone healing in impacted mandibular third molar extraction sockets 30 and 90 days after surgery. It is thought that PRF has the potential characteristics of an autologous fibrin matrix and can accelerate the healing. To better understand the effects of PRF on healing, further research is warranted with larger sample sizes.

Indexed as

Blood PlateletsTooth SocketAdultFemaleFibrinHumansMaleOsteoblastsTooth, ImpactedWound HealingYoung AdultFibrin

Identifiers

PMID25475771
PMCPMC4320413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.