ArticleThe patient2015
Patient perspectives and experience with dalfampridine treatment in multiple sclerosis-related walking impairment: the step together program.
Article in The patient, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDalfampridine extended-release tablets (dalfampridine-ER; in Europe, prolonged-release fampridine, and elsewhere, fampridine modified or fampridine sustained release), 10 mg twice daily, are available for the treatment of improvement of walking in patients with multiple sclerosis, as demonstrated by an increase in walking speed. On-drug patient perspectives and experiences are valuable to understand and manage this patient population.
objectiveThe objective of this study was to examine perspectives and experiences of patients receiving dalfampridine-ER in a real-world setting.
methodsStep Together, an ongoing program that captures real-world patient experience with dalfampridine-ER treatment, consists of a survey administered at baseline (before dalfampridine-ER initiation) and at 30 (first follow-up) and 60 days (second follow-up) after initiation. The survey includes modified versions of the 12-item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale (mMSWS-12) and the Sheehan Disability Scale (mSDS) to assess walking ability and functional impairment, respectively.
resultsAs of September 2013, 2,248 patients participated in the baseline survey and 522 completed both follow-up surveys (completers). Among the completers, improvements in walking ability and function relative to baseline were significant at both follow-ups as measured by mMSWS-12 and mSDS scores, respectively. Notably, 69-74 % of completers at both follow-ups had improved mMSWS-12 scores, with scores greater than the range considered to be minimally clinically significant. Patients who completed the program expressed satisfaction with overall dalfampridine-ER treatment, and 69 % indicated that the survey would help them communicate better with their healthcare providers.
conclusionResults highlight the utility of patient-reported outcomes in the assessment of patient perspective and experience, providing a useful supplement to traditional objective measures used in clinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.