Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25475614›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science and pollution research international2015

Proteomic tools to decipher microbial community structure and functioning.

Florence Arsène-Ploetze, Philippe N Bertin, Christine Carapito

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Environmental microbiology reveals the Earth secret life.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2015
    Article
  12. Environmental microbiology as a mosaic of explored ecosystems and issues.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Florence Arsène-PloetzeGénétique moléculaire, Génomique et Microbiologie, Université de Strasbourg, UMR7156 CNRS, Strasbourg, France, ploetze@unistra.fr.
Philippe N Bertin
Christine Carapito

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in microbial ecology allow studying microorganisms in their environment, without laboratory cultivation, in order to get access to the large uncultivable microbial community. With this aim, environmental proteomics has emerged as an appropriate complementary approach to metagenomics providing information on key players that carry out main metabolic functions and addressing the adaptation capacities of living organisms in situ. In this review, a wide range of proteomic approaches applied to investigate the structure and functioning of microbial communities as well as recent examples of such studies are presented.

Indexed as

Environmental MicrobiologyAnimalsBacterial ProteinsHumansMetagenomicsMicrobial InteractionsMicrobiotaProteomeProteomicsBacterial ProteinsProteome

Identifiers

PMID25475614
PMCPMC4560766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.