Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25475601›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2015

Switching from rivaroxaban to warfarin: an open label pharmacodynamic study in healthy subjects.

Kenneth Todd Moore, William Byra, Seema Vaidyanathan, Jaya Natarajan, Jay Ariyawansa, Hiba Salih, Kenneth C Turner

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kenneth Todd MooreJanssen Research & Development, LLC, Titusville, NJ.
William ByraJanssen Research & Development, LLC, Raritan, NJ.
Seema VaidyanathanJanssen Research & Development, LLC, Springhouse, PA, USA.
Jaya NatarajanJanssen Research & Development, LLC, Raritan, NJ.
Jay AriyawansaJanssen Research & Development, LLC, Raritan, NJ.
Hiba SalihClinical Pharmacology Unit, Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Antwerp, Belgium.
Kenneth C TurnerJanssen Research & Development, LLC, Titusville, NJ.
Janssen (United States) · USJanssen (Belgium) · BESpringhouse · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe primary objective was to explore the pharmacodynamic changes during transition from rivaroxaban to warfarin in healthy subjects. Safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics were assessed as secondary objectives.

methodsAn open label, non-randomized, sequential two period study. In treatment period 1 (TP1), subjects received rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily (5 days), followed by co-administration with a warfarin loading dose regimen of 5 or 10 mg (for the 10 mg regimen, the dose could be uptitrated to attain target international normalized ratio [INR] ≥2.0) once daily (2-4 days). When trough INR values ≥2.0 were attained, rivaroxaban was discontinued and warfarin treatment continued as monotherapy (INR 2.0-3.0). During treatment period 2, subjects received the same warfarin regimen as in TP1, but without rivaroxaban.

resultsDuring co-administration, maximum INR and prothrombin time (PT) values were higher than with rivaroxaban or warfarin monotherapy. The mean maximum effect (Emax ) for INR after co-administration was 2.79-4.15 (mean PT Emax 41.0-62.7 s), compared with 1.41-1.74 (mean PT Emax 20.1-25.2 s) for warfarin alone. However, rivaroxaban had the smallest effect on INR at trough rivaroxaban concentrations. Neither rivaroxaban nor warfarin significantly affected maximum plasma concentrations of the other drug.

conclusionsThe combined pharmacodynamic effects during co-administration of rivaroxaban and warfarin were greater than additive, but the pharmacokinetics of both drugs were unaffected. Co-administration was well tolerated. When transitioning from rivaroxaban to warfarin, INR monitoring during co-administration should be performed at the trough rivaroxaban concentration to minimize the effect of rivaroxaban on INR.

Indexed as

Drug SubstitutionAdultAnticoagulantsBelgiumBlood CoagulationDrug Administration ScheduleDrug InteractionsDrug MonitoringFactor Xa InhibitorsFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansInternational Normalized RatioMaleMiddle AgedProthrombin TimeAnticoagulantsFactor Xa InhibitorsRivaroxabanWarfarinpharmacodynamicpharmacokineticrivaroxabanswitchingwarfarin

Identifiers

PMID25475601
PMCPMC4456123
OpenAlexW1512989178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.