Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25475521›Full record

ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2015

Quantitative SPECT/CT Imaging of (177)Lu with In Vivo Validation in Patients Undergoing Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy.

J C Sanders, T Kuwert, J Hornegger, P Ritt

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Quantitative SPECT/CT: Technique and Clinical Applications.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Validation ofEJNMMI physics · 2023
    Article
  6. Towards accurateEJNMMI physics · 2023
    Article
  7. Reconstructed SPECT images ofScientific data · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Accuracy ofEJNMMI physics · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J C SandersPattern Recognition Lab, Department of Computer Science, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Martensstr. 3, 91058, Erlangen, Germany, James.Sanders@uk-erlangen.de.
T Kuwert
J Hornegger
P Ritt

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study is to extend an established SPECT/CT quantitation protocol to (177)Lu and validate it in vivo using urine samples, thus providing a basis for 3D dosimetry of (177)Lu radiotherapy and improvement over current planar methods which improperly account for anatomical variations, attenuation, and overlapping organs. PROCEDURES: In our quantitation protocol, counts in images reconstructed using an ordered subset-expectation maximization algorithm are converted to kilobecquerels per milliliter using a calibration factor derived from a phantom experiment. While varying reconstruction parameters, we tracked the ratio of image to true activity concentration (recovery coefficient, RC) in hot spheres and a noise measure in a homogeneous region. The optimal parameter set was selected as the point where recovery in the largest three spheres (16, 8, and 4 ml) stagnated, while the noise continued to increase. Urine samples were collected following 12 SPECT/CT acquisitions of patients undergoing [(177)Lu]DOTATATE therapy, and activity concentrations were measured in a well counter. Data was reconstructed using parameters chosen in the phantom experiment, and estimated activity concentration from the images was compared to the urine values to derive RCs.

resultsIn phantom data, our chosen parameter set yielded RCs in 16, 8, and 4 ml spheres of 80.0, 74.1, and 64.5 %, respectively. For patients, the mean bladder RC was 96.1 ± 13.2% (range, 80.6-122.4 %), with a 95 % confidence interval between 88.6 and 103.6 %. The mean error of SPECT/CT concentrations was 10.1 ± 8.3% (range, -19.4-22.4 %).

conclusionsOur results show that quantitative (177)Lu SPECT/CT in vivo is feasible but could benefit from improved reconstruction methods. Quantifying bladder activity is analogous to determining the amount of activity in the kidneys, an important task in dosimetry, and our results provide a useful benchmark for future efforts.

Indexed as

Digestive System NeoplasmsNeuroendocrine TumorsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOctreotideOrganometallic CompoundsPhantoms, ImagingTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonTomography, X-Ray ComputedUrinary Bladderlutetium Lu 177 dotatateOctreotideOrganometallic Compounds

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.