Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25475492›Full record

ReviewUrolithiasis2015

Vascular theory of the formation of Randall plaques.

Eric R Taylor, Marshall L Stoller

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Urolithiasis, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Activation of ROS/NF-Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Mice with a Brd4 Mutation Represent a New Model of Nephrocalcinosis.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eric R TaylorUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Marshall L Stoller

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relationship between calcium-based calculi and Randall plaques is well documented, but the role these plaques play in the early process of urinary stone formation remains unknown. The vascular hypothesis of Randall plaque formation has been proposed, and recent works support this concept. The renal papilla's vascular environment is subject to relative hypoxia, hyperosmolar surroundings, and turbulent blood flow. These factors together create an environment prone to vascular injury and may potentiate Randall plaque precipitation. Recent data support the similarity between the vascular calcification process itself and urinary stone formation. Furthermore, epidemiological studies have suggested an association between urinary stones, adverse cardiovascular events, and vascular calcification risk factors. The concept that an initial vascular insult precipitates a Randall plaque and subsequent urolithiasis is compelling and represents an area in need of continued research. This may lead to future novel treatment approaches to urolithiasis.

Indexed as

CalcinosisHumansKidney DiseasesKidney MedullaVascular Calcification

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.