Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25475353›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2015

Neural responses in songbird forebrain reflect learning rates, acquired salience, and stimulus novelty after auditory discrimination training.

Brittany A Bell, Mimi L Phan, David S Vicario

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Adaptation in auditory processing.Physiological reviews · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A circuit model of auditory cortex.PLoS computational biology · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brittany A BellRutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey bab255@scarletmail.rutgers.edu.
Mimi L PhanRutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
David S VicarioRutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

Auditory Processing and Memory for Complex SignalsR01DC008854 · NIDCD · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI VICARIO, DAVID S · 2008 to 2012
$1.7M
Auditory-Vocal Processing in a Behavioral ContextR21DC013174 · NIDCD · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI VICARIO, DAVID S · 2013 to 2014
$416k
NIDCD NIH HHS DC-008854NIDCD NIH HHS DC-013174NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC008854NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC013174
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How do social interactions form and modulate the neural representations of specific complex signals? This question can be addressed in the songbird auditory system. Like humans, songbirds learn to vocalize by imitating tutors heard during development. These learned vocalizations are important in reproductive and social interactions and in individual recognition. As a model for the social reinforcement of particular songs, male zebra finches were trained to peck for a food reward in response to one song stimulus (GO) and to withhold responding for another (NoGO). After performance reached criterion, single and multiunit neural responses to both trained and novel stimuli were obtained from multiple electrodes inserted bilaterally into two songbird auditory processing areas [caudomedial mesopallium (CMM) and caudomedial nidopallium (NCM)] of awake, restrained birds. Neurons in these areas undergo stimulus-specific adaptation to repeated song stimuli, and responses to familiar stimuli adapt more slowly than to novel stimuli. The results show that auditory responses differed in NCM and CMM for trained (GO and NoGO) stimuli vs. novel song stimuli. When subjects were grouped by the number of training days required to reach criterion, fast learners showed larger neural responses and faster stimulus-specific adaptation to all stimuli than slow learners in both areas. Furthermore, responses in NCM of fast learners were more strongly left-lateralized than in slow learners. Thus auditory responses in these sensory areas not only encode stimulus familiarity, but also reflect behavioral reinforcement in our paradigm, and can potentially be modulated by social interactions.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionDiscrimination, PsychologicalLearningVocalization, AnimalAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsFinchesMaleNeuronsProsencephalonReaction Timeelectrophysiologyindividual recognitionlateralizationsongbirdstimulus specific adaptation

Identifiers

PMID25475353
PMCPMC4346724
OpenAlexW2089197386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.