Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25475348›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2015

Heightened eating drive and visual food stimuli attenuate central nociceptive processing.

Hazel Wright, Xiaoyun Li, Nicholas B Fallon, Timo Giesbrecht, Anna Thomas, Joanne A Harrold, Jason C G Halford, Andrej Stancak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hazel WrightDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom; and.
Xiaoyun LiDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom; and.
Nicholas B FallonDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom; and.
Timo GiesbrechtUnilever R&D, Vlaardingen, The Netherlands.
Anna ThomasUnilever R&D, Vlaardingen, The Netherlands.
Joanne A HarroldDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom; and.
Jason C G HalfordDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom; and.
Andrej StancakDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom; and.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I015809/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hunger and pain are basic drives that compete for a behavioral response when experienced together. To investigate the cortical processes underlying hunger-pain interactions, we manipulated participants' hunger and presented photographs of appetizing food or inedible objects in combination with painful laser stimuli. Fourteen healthy participants completed two EEG sessions: one after an overnight fast, the other following a large breakfast. Spatio-temporal patterns of cortical activation underlying the hunger-pain competition were explored with 128-channel EEG recordings and source dipole analysis of laser-evoked potentials (LEPs). We found that initial pain ratings were temporarily reduced when participants were hungry compared with fed. Source activity in parahippocampal gyrus was weaker when participants were hungry, and activations of operculo-insular cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, parahippocampal gyrus, and cerebellum were smaller in the context of appetitive food photographs than in that of inedible object photographs. Cortical processing of noxious stimuli in pain-related brain structures is reduced and pain temporarily attenuated when people are hungry or passively viewing food photographs, suggesting a possible interaction between the opposing motivational forces of the eating drive and pain.

Indexed as

NociceptionVisual PerceptionAdultAppetiteCerebellumFemaleFoodGyrus CinguliHumansHungerLaser-Evoked PotentialsMaleParahippocampal GyrusPhotic StimulationappetiteEEGhungerpainsource analysis

Identifiers

PMID25475348
PMCPMC4346715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.