Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25475345›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2015

Blocking central pathways in the primate motor system using high-frequency sinusoidal current.

Karen M Fisher, Ngalla E Jillani, George O Oluoch, Stuart N Baker

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Pairing Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Loud Sounds Produces Plastic Changes in Motor Output.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Evidence for Subcortical Plasticity after Paired Stimulation from a Wearable Device.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Cortical, Corticospinal, and Reticulospinal Contributions to Strength Training.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Karen M FisherInstitute of Neuroscience, Medical School, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom; and.
Ngalla E JillaniInstitute of Primate Research, National Museums of Kenya, Karen, Nairobi, Kenya.
George O OluochInstitute of Primate Research, National Museums of Kenya, Karen, Nairobi, Kenya.
Stuart N BakerInstitute of Neuroscience, Medical School, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom; and stuart.baker@ncl.ac.uk.
National Museums of Kenya · KENewcastle University · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 101002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrical stimulation with high-frequency (2-10 kHz) sinusoidal currents has previously been shown to produce a transient and complete nerve block in the peripheral nervous system. Modeling and in vitro studies suggest that this is due to a prolonged local depolarization across a broad section of membrane underlying the blocking electrode. Previous work has used cuff electrodes wrapped around the peripheral nerve to deliver the blocking stimulus. We extended this technique to central motor pathways, using a single metal microelectrode to deliver focal sinusoidal currents to the corticospinal tract at the cervical spinal cord in anesthetized adult baboons. The extent of conduction block was assessed by stimulating a second electrode caudal to the blocking site and recording the antidromic field potential over contralateral primary motor cortex. The maximal block achieved was 99.6%, similar to findings of previous work in peripheral fibers, and the optimal frequency for blocking was 2 kHz. Block had a rapid onset, being complete as soon as the transient activation associated with the start of the sinusoidal current was over. High-frequency block was also successfully applied to the pyramidal tract at the medulla, ascending sensory pathways in the dorsal columns, and the descending systems of the medial longitudinal fasciculus. High-frequency sinusoidal stimulation produces transient, reversible lesions in specific target locations and therefore could be a useful alternative to permanent tissue transection in some experimental paradigms. It also could help to control or prevent some of the hyperactivity associated with chronic neurological disorders.

Indexed as

AnimalsElectric StimulationMaleMotor CortexPapioPeripheral Nervescorticospinalhigh-frequency block

Identifiers

PMID25475345
PMCPMC4346720
OpenAlexW2047179698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.