Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25475244›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2014

Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 for managing infant colic: protocol for an individual participant data meta-analysis.

Valerie Sung, Michael D Cabana, Frank D'Amico, Girish Deshpande, Christophe Dupont, Flavia Indrio, Silja Mentula, Anna Partty, Francesco Savino, Hania Szajewska and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Infantile Colic: New Insights into an Old Problem.Gastroenterology clinics of North America · 2018
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Valerie SungMurdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Michael D CabanaDepartment of Pediatrics, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) School of Medicine, San Francisco, California, USA.
Frank D'AmicoDuquesne University/UPMC St. Margaret Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Girish DeshpandeDepartment of Children's health division and NICU, Nepean Hospital Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Sydney Medical School Nepean, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Christophe DupontDepartment of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Paris Descartes University, Necker Hospital, Paris, France.
Flavia IndrioDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Silja MentulaBacteriology Unit, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Anna ParttyDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Francesco SavinoOspedale Infantile Regina Margherita, Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy.
Hania SzajewskaDepartment of Paediatrics, The Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Daniel TancrediDepartment of Pediatrics, UC Davis Health System, Sacramento, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInfant colic, or excessive crying of unknown cause in infants less than 3 months old, is common and burdensome. Its aetiology is undetermined, and consensus on its management is still lacking. Recent studies suggest a possible link between infant colic and gut microbiota, indicating probiotics to be a promising treatment. However, only a few strains have been tested, and results from randomised controlled trials are conflicting. It is important to clarify whether probiotics are effective for treating infant colic in general, and to identify whether certain subgroups of infants with colic would benefit from particular strains of probiotics. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Through an individual participant data meta-analysis (IPDMA), we aim to identify whether the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 is effective in the management of infant colic, and to clarify whether its effects differ according to feeding method (breast vs formula vs combined), proton pump inhibitor exposure, and antibiotic exposure. The primary outcomes are infant crying duration and treatment success (at least 50% reduction in crying time from baseline) at 21 days postintervention. Individual participant data from all studies will be modelled simultaneously in multilevel generalised linear mixed-effects regression models to account for the nesting of participants within studies. Subgroup analyses of participant-level and intervention-level characteristics will be undertaken on the primary outcomes to assess if the intervention effect differs between certain groups of infants. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approved by the Royal Children's Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC 34081). Results will be reported in a peer-reviewed journal in 2015. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42014013210.

Indexed as

ColicLimosilactobacillus reuteriProbioticsHumansInfantMeta-Analysis as TopicTreatment OutcomeCOMPLEMENTARY MEDICINENUTRITION & DIETETICSPERINATOLOGY

Identifiers

PMID25475244
PMCPMC4256605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.