ArticleCell research2015
Correction of a genetic disease by CRISPR-Cas9-mediated gene editing in mouse spermatogonial stem cells.
Article in Cell research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 113 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
113 citing papers in PubMed, 242 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of DNA methylation patterns of parentally imprinted genes in placenta derived from IVF conceptions in two different culture media.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2020Trial
- Long-Term Labeling and Differentiation Monitoring of Mouse Spermatogonial Stem Cells Using CellREADR.Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2026Article
- From mechanism to medicine: CRISPR‒Cas9 delivery strategies, therapeutic applications and translation challenges.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Testicular mRNA-LNP Delivery: A Novel Therapy for Genetic Spermatogenic Disorders.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Mechanism and potential therapeutic strategies of genetic abnormalities involved in deoxyribonucleic acid double-strand breaks leading to the development of human non-obstructive azoospermia.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2026Review
- Male germ cell technologies in large animals.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2026Review
- Gene therapy for non-obstructive azoospermia: therapeutic avenues and translational pathway to clinical application.Frontiers in genome editing · 2026Review
- Genome Editing for Fertility: Unlocking the Promise of CRISPR/Cas9 in Addressing Male Infertility - A Narrative Review.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2025Review
- Unraveling Etiological Indications and Therapeutic Implications of Familial Cerebral Cavernous Malformations in the Dawn of Gene Therapy for Monogenic Conditions.Current gene therapy · 2025Article
- Enhancing Specificity, Precision, Accessibility, Flexibility, and Safety to Overcome Traditional CRISPR/Cas Editing Challenges and Shape Future Innovations.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- CRISPR-Cas9 Gene Therapy: Non-Viral Delivery and Stimuli-Responsive Nanoformulations.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Genome editing in mouse spermatogonial stem cell lines targeting the Tex15 gene using CRISPR/Cas9.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Sertoli cells-only syndrome: current clinical approaches and ongoing research trends.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- Adenine base editors induce off-target structure variations in mouse embryos and primary human T cells.Genome biology · 2024Article
- Exosomes for CRISPR-Cas9 Delivery: The Cutting Edge in Genome Editing.Molecular biotechnology · 2024Review
- Unlocking Genome Editing: Advances and Obstacles in CRISPR/Cas Delivery Technologies.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Review
- Microenvironment of spermatogonial stem cells: a key factor in the regulation of spermatogenesis.Stem cell research & therapy · 2024Review
- Study of tree shrew biology and models: A booming and prosperous field for biomedical research.Zoological research · 2024Review
- Through theGenes · 2024Review
- Genome editing: An insight into disease resistance, production efficiency, and biomedical applications in livestock.Functional & integrative genomics · 2024Review
53 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
22 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) can produce numerous male gametes after transplantation into recipient testes, presenting a valuable approach for gene therapy and continuous production of gene-modified animals. However, successful genetic manipulation of SSCs has been limited, partially due to complexity and low efficiency of currently available genetic editing techniques. Here, we show that efficient genetic modifications can be introduced into SSCs using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. We used the CRISPR-Cas9 system to mutate an EGFP transgene or the endogenous Crygc gene in SCCs. The mutated SSCs underwent spermatogenesis after transplantation into the seminiferous tubules of infertile mouse testes. Round spermatids were generated and, after injection into mature oocytes, supported the production of heterozygous offspring displaying the corresponding mutant phenotypes. Furthermore, a disease-causing mutation in Crygc (Crygc(-/-)) that pre-existed in SSCs could be readily repaired by CRISPR-Cas9-induced nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) or homology-directed repair (HDR), resulting in SSC lines carrying the corrected gene with no evidence of off-target modifications as shown by whole-genome sequencing. Fertilization using round spermatids generated from these lines gave rise to offspring with the corrected phenotype at an efficiency of 100%. Our results demonstrate efficient gene editing in mouse SSCs by the CRISPR-Cas9 system, and provide the proof of principle of curing a genetic disease via gene correction in SSCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.