Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25474591›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Live imaging provides new insights on dynamic F-actin filopodia and differential endocytosis during myoblast fusion in Drosophila.

Shruti Haralalka, Claude Shelton, Heather N Cartwright, Fengli Guo, Rhonda Trimble, Ram P Kumar, Susan M Abmayr

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Cells · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. RNAi Screen inG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2019
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shruti HaralalkaStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, Missouri, 64110, United States of America.
Claude SheltonStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, Missouri, 64110, United States of America.
Heather N CartwrightStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, Missouri, 64110, United States of America.
Fengli GuoStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, Missouri, 64110, United States of America.
Rhonda TrimbleStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, Missouri, 64110, United States of America.
Ram P KumarStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, Missouri, 64110, United States of America.
Susan M AbmayrStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, Missouri, 64110, United States of America; Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, 66160, United States of America.
Stowers Institute for Medical Research · US

Funding

IDENTIFICATION OF GENES ASSOCIATED WITH MYOBLAST FUSIONR01AR044274 · NIAMS · STOWERS INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH · PI ABMAYR, SUSAN M · 1996 to 2012
$3.6M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR044274NIAMS NIH HHS R01-AR44274
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The process of myogenesis includes the recognition, adhesion, and fusion of committed myoblasts into multinucleate syncytia. In the larval body wall muscles of Drosophila, this elaborate process is initiated by Founder Cells and Fusion-Competent Myoblasts (FCMs), and cell adhesion molecules Kin-of-IrreC (Kirre) and Sticks-and-stones (Sns) on their respective surfaces. The FCMs appear to provide the driving force for fusion, via the assembly of protrusions associated with branched F-actin and the WASp, SCAR and Arp2/3 pathways. In the present study, we utilize the dorsal pharyngeal musculature that forms in the Drosophila embryo as a model to explore myoblast fusion and visualize the fusion process in live embryos. These muscles rely on the same cell types and genes as the body wall muscles, but are amenable to live imaging since they do not undergo extensive morphogenetic movement during formation. Time-lapse imaging with F-actin and membrane markers revealed dynamic FCM-associated actin-enriched protrusions that rapidly extend and retract into the myotube from different sites within the actin focus. Ultrastructural analysis of this actin-enriched area showed that they have two morphologically distinct structures: wider invasions and/or narrow filopodia that contain long linear filaments. Consistent with this, formin Diaphanous (Dia) and branched actin nucleator, Arp3, are found decorating the filopodia or enriched at the actin focus, respectively, indicating that linear actin is present along with branched actin at sites of fusion in the FCM. Gain-of-function Dia and loss-of-function Arp3 both lead to fusion defects, a decrease of F-actin foci and prominent filopodia from the FCMs. We also observed differential endocytosis of cell surface components at sites of fusion, with actin reorganizing factors, WASp and SCAR, and Kirre remaining on the myotube surface and Sns preferentially taken up with other membrane proteins into early endosomes and lysosomes in the myotube.

Indexed as

EndocytosisMolecular ImagingActin-Related Protein 2-3 ComplexActinsAnimalsCarrier ProteinsCell FusionCell MembraneDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsForminsGene Expression RegulationMuscle Fibers, SkeletalMyoblastsPharyngeal MusclesPseudopodiaActin-Related Protein 2-3 ComplexActinsCarrier Proteinsdiaphanous protein, DrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsFormins

Identifiers

PMID25474591
PMCPMC4256407
OpenAlexW1977650696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.