Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25474574›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2014

Extensive copy-number variation of young genes across stickleback populations.

Frédéric J J Chain, Philine G D Feulner, Mahesh Panchal, Christophe Eizaguirre, Irene E Samonte, Martin Kalbe, Tobias L Lenz, Monika Stoll, Erich Bornberg-Bauer, Manfred Milinski and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Copy Number Variation (CNV): A New Genomic Insight in Horses.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Threespine Stickleback: A Model System For Evolutionary Genomics.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2021
    Review
  13. Extensive genome-wide duplications in the eastern oyster (Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The role of copy-number variation in the reinforcement of sexual isolation between the two European subspecies of the house mouse.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Frédéric J J ChainDepartment of Evolutionary Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Plön, Germany.
Philine G D FeulnerDepartment of Evolutionary Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Plön, Germany; Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity, Evolutionary Bioinformatics, Westfälische Wilhelms University, Münster, Germany.
Mahesh PanchalDepartment of Evolutionary Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Plön, Germany.
Christophe EizaguirreSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Irene E SamonteDepartment of Evolutionary Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Plön, Germany.
Martin KalbeDepartment of Evolutionary Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Plön, Germany.
Tobias L LenzDepartment of Evolutionary Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Plön, Germany.
Monika StollGenetic Epidemiology, Westfälische Wilhelms University, Münster, Germany.
Erich Bornberg-BauerInstitute for Evolution and Biodiversity, Evolutionary Bioinformatics, Westfälische Wilhelms University, Münster, Germany.
Manfred MilinskiDepartment of Evolutionary Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Plön, Germany.
Thorsten B H ReuschEvolutionary Ecology of Marine Fishes, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research, Kiel, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Duplicate genes emerge as copy-number variations (CNVs) at the population level, and remain copy-number polymorphic until they are fixed or lost. The successful establishment of such structural polymorphisms in the genome plays an important role in evolution by promoting genetic diversity, complexity and innovation. To characterize the early evolutionary stages of duplicate genes and their potential adaptive benefits, we combine comparative genomics with population genomics analyses to evaluate the distribution and impact of CNVs across natural populations of an eco-genomic model, the three-spined stickleback. With whole genome sequences of 66 individuals from populations inhabiting three distinct habitats, we find that CNVs generally occur at low frequencies and are often only found in one of the 11 populations surveyed. A subset of CNVs, however, displays copy-number differentiation between populations, showing elevated within-population frequencies consistent with local adaptation. By comparing teleost genomes to identify lineage-specific genes and duplications in sticklebacks, we highlight rampant gene content differences among individuals in which over 30% of young duplicate genes are CNVs. These CNV genes are evolving rapidly at the molecular level and are enriched with functional categories associated with environmental interactions, depicting the dynamic early copy-number polymorphic stage of genes during population differentiation.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsGenetic VariationAdaptation, BiologicalAnimalsEvolution, MolecularFemaleGene DeletionGene DosageGene DuplicationGenes, DuplicateMaleMetagenomicsPhylogenySmegmamorpha

Identifiers

PMID25474574
PMCPMC4256280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.