Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25474432›Full record

ReviewMedicine2014

Infliximab for peripheral ulcerative keratitis treatment.

Valentín Huerva, Francisco J Ascaso, Andrzej Grzybowski

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Peripheral Ulcerative Keratitis: A Review.Journal of ophthalmic & vision research
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Valentín HuervaFrom the Department of Ophthalmology (VH), University Hospital Arnau de Vilanova; IRB Lleida (VH), Lleida; Department of Ophthalmology, "Lozano Blesa" University Clinic Hospital (FJA); Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud (FJA), Zaragoza, Spain; and Department of Ophthalmology (AG), Poznań City Hospital, Poznań, Poland.
Francisco J Ascaso
Andrzej Grzybowski
Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biologic agents such as anti-TNFα have been employed in treatment paradigms for ocular inflammation. Peripheral corneal ulceration (PUK) is a devastating disorder consisting of a crescent-shaped area of destructive inflammation at the margin of the corneal stroma. It is associated with an epithelial defect, the presence of stromal inflammatory cells, and progressive stromal degradation and thinning, leading to ocular perforation and devastating visual loss. Macroulcerative PUK is usually a local manifestation of a systemic vasculitis. In many cases, the disease may be resistant to high doses of systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressants. Chimeric anti-TNFα has been employed when all other treatments have failed. Isolated cases and short series of cases have been reported. This paper summarizes the available reports on the use, efficacy, and safety of infliximab in the treatment of PUK.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalCorneal UlcerHumansInfliximabTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, MonoclonalAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalInfliximab

Identifiers

PMID25474432
PMCPMC4616390
OpenAlexW2009752339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.