Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25474246›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2015

Quantitative assessment of miR34a as an independent prognostic marker in breast cancer.

Seema Agarwal, J Hanna, M E Sherman, J Figueroa, D L Rimm

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Tumor-suppressive microRNA-34a inhibits breast cancer cell migration and invasion via targeting oncogenic TPD52.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Seema AgarwalDepartment of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
J HannaDepartment of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
M E ShermanDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD 20852, USA.
J FigueroaDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD 20852, USA.
D L RimmDepartment of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
National Cancer Institute · USYale University · USSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital · US

Funding

Hormone-Related CancersZIACP010126 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI GIERACH, GRETCHEN · 2009 to 2025
$103.5M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAberrant expression of microRNAs (miRNAs) is associated with cancer progression, initiation and metastasis. MiR34a is a miRNA that has been previously described as a tumour suppressor. Herein, we assess the expression of miR34a in three independent breast cancer cohorts using a quantitative in situ hybridisation assay (qISH) and determined its association with disease-specific death in breast cancer.

methodsThe qISH method was applied to three independent primary breast cancer cohorts (Cohort 1 with 461, Cohort 2 with 279 and Cohort 3 with 795 patients) using 5' and 3' double DIG-labelled LNA-modified probe against miR34a using the protocol described previously. Level of expression measured as automated quantitative analysis (AQUA) score for miR34a was determined for each patient and assessed for association with risk of disease-specific death. An optimal cutpoint was determined using the X-tile software for disease-specific survival in Cohort 1 and this cutpoint was then applied to the other two cohorts after median normalisation of AQUA scores.

resultsLoss of miR34a is associated with poor outcome in three independent breast cancer cohorts (uncorrected log-rank P=0.0188 for Cohort 1, log-rank P=0.0024 for Cohort 2 and log-rank P=0.0455 for Cohort 3). In all three cohorts, loss of miR34a is able to stratify patients with poor disease-specific survival among node-negative patients, but not in node-positive population. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis in Cohort 1 (P=0.0381) and Cohort 2 (P=0.0468) revealed that loss of miR34a is associated with poor outcome, independent of age, node status, receptor status and tumour size.

conclusionLoss of the tumour suppressor, miR34a, identifies a subgroup of breast cancer patients with poor disease-specific survival. This study is consistent with the well-established preclinical observations for miR34a as a tumour suppressor and suggests that miR34a may have future value as a biomarker in breast cancer.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMicroRNAsPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAsMIRN34 microRNA, human

Identifiers

PMID25474246
PMCPMC4453614
OpenAlexW2090464574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.