ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2014
Comparative effectiveness of different strategies of oral cholera vaccination in bangladesh: a modeling study.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Protection against cholera from killed whole-cell oral cholera vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The Lancet. Infectious diseases · 2017Pooled it
- Coupling plankton and cholera dynamics: Insights into outbreak prediction and practical disease management.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Water pollution, cholera, and the role of probiotics: a comprehensive review in relation to public health in Bangladesh.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
- Cost of oral cholera vaccine delivery in a mass immunization program for children in urban Bangladesh.Vaccine: X · 2022Article
- Mathematical Modeling of Endemic Cholera Transmission.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2021Article
- Comparing alternative cholera vaccination strategies in Maela refugee camp: using a transmission model in public health practice.BMC infectious diseases · 2019Article
- Oral cholera vaccines and their impact on the global burden of disease.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2019Review
- The impact and cost-effectiveness of controlling cholera through the use of oral cholera vaccines in urban Bangladesh: A disease modeling and economic analysis.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2018Article
- Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment and Infectious Disease Transmission Modeling of Waterborne Enteric Pathogens.Current environmental health reports · 2018Review
- Oral cholera vaccine coverage during a preventive door-to-door mass vaccination campaign in Nampula, Mozambique.PloS one · 2018Article
- The importance of thinking beyond the water-supply in cholera epidemics: A historical urban case-study.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2017Article
- Controlling cholera in the Ouest Department of Haiti using oral vaccines.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2017Article
- Why is the oral cholera vaccine not considered an option for prevention of cholera in India? Analysis of possible reasons.The Indian journal of medical research · 2016Article
- Seasonality and the effectiveness of mass vaccination.Mathematical biosciences and engineering : MBE · 2016Article
- The First Use of the Global Oral Cholera Vaccine Emergency Stockpile: Lessons from South Sudan.PLoS medicine · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundKilled, oral cholera vaccines have proven safe and effective, and several large-scale mass cholera vaccination efforts have demonstrated the feasibility of widespread deployment. This study uses a mathematical model of cholera transmission in Bangladesh to examine the effectiveness of potential vaccination strategies. METHODS &
findingsWe developed an age-structured mathematical model of cholera transmission and calibrated it to reproduce the dynamics of cholera in Matlab, Bangladesh. We used the model to predict the effectiveness of different cholera vaccination strategies over a period of 20 years. We explored vaccination programs that targeted one of three increasingly focused age groups (the entire vaccine-eligible population of age one year and older, children of ages 1 to 14 years, or preschoolers of ages 1 to 4 years) and that could occur either as campaigns recurring every five years or as continuous ongoing vaccination efforts. Our modeling results suggest that vaccinating 70% of the population would avert 90% of cholera cases in the first year but that campaign and continuous vaccination strategies differ in effectiveness over 20 years. Maintaining 70% coverage of the population would be sufficient to prevent sustained transmission of endemic cholera in Matlab, while vaccinating periodically every five years is less effective. Selectively vaccinating children 1-14 years old would prevent the most cholera cases per vaccine administered in both campaign and continuous strategies.
conclusionsWe conclude that continuous mass vaccination would be more effective against endemic cholera than periodic campaigns. Vaccinating children averts more cases per dose than vaccinating all age groups, although vaccinating only children is unlikely to control endemic cholera in Bangladesh. Careful consideration must be made before generalizing these results to other regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.