Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25473827›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Identifying change points in a covariate effect on time-to-event analysis with reduced isotonic regression.

Yong Ma, Yinglei Lai, John M Lachin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yong MaThe Biostatistics Center, George Washington University, Rockville, MD, United States of America; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Yinglei LaiThe Biostatistics Center, George Washington University, Rockville, MD, United States of America; Department of Statistics, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States of America.
John M LachinThe Biostatistics Center, George Washington University, Rockville, MD, United States of America; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Isotonic regression is a useful tool to investigate the relationship between a quantitative covariate and a time-to-event outcome. The resulting non-parametric model is a monotonic step function of a covariate X and the steps can be viewed as change points in the underlying hazard function. However, when there are too many steps, over-fitting can occur and further reduction is desirable. We propose a reduced isotonic regression approach to allow combination of small neighboring steps that are not statistically significantly different. In this approach, a second stage, the reduction stage, is integrated into the usual monotonic step building algorithm by comparing the adjacent steps using appropriate statistical testing. This is achieved through a modified dynamic programming algorithm. We implemented the approach with the simple exponential distribution and then its extension, the Weibull distribution. Simulation studies are used to investigate the properties of the resulting isotonic functions. We apply this methodology to the Diabetes Control and Complication Trial (DCCT) data set to identify potential change points in the association between HbA1c and the risk of severe hypoglycemia.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalAlgorithmsGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemiaRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, human

Identifiers

PMID25473827
PMCPMC4256386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.