Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25473653›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the ... IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics. IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics2014

A Prototype Body-Mounted MRI-Compatible Robot for Needle Guidance in Shoulder Arthrography.

R Monfaredi, R Seifabadi, I Iordachita, R Sze, N M Safdar, K Sharma, S Fricke, A Krieger, K Cleary

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the ... IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics. IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Modeling and Control of an MR-Safe Pneumatic Radial Inflow Motor and Encoder (PRIME).IEEE/ASME transactions on mechatronics : a joint publication of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society and the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division · 2024
    Article
  3. Flexible Needle Bending Model for Spinal Injection Procedures.IEEE robotics and automation letters · 2023
    Article
  4. State of the Art and Future Opportunities in MRI-Guided Robot-Assisted Surgery and Interventions.Proceedings of the IEEE. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · 2022
    Article
  5. An MR-Conditional Needle Driver for Robot-Assisted Spinal Injections: Design Modifications and Evaluations.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. MR-Conditional Actuations: A Review.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Robotically assisted long bone biopsy under MRI: cadaver study results.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2019
    Article
  11. Remotely Actuated Needle Driving Device for MRI-Guided Percutaneous Interventions.... International Symposium on Medical Robotics. International Symposium on Medical Robotics · 2019
    Article
  12. Development of a shoulder-mounted robot for MRI-guided needle placement: phantom study.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2018
    Article
  13. Enabling Technology for MRI-Guided Intervention.Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

R MonfarediSheikh Zayed Institute for Pediatric Surgical Innovation, Children's National Medical Center, 111 Michigan Ave. DC 20010 USA; Industrial Department, Azad University Sough Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran.
R SeifabadiSheikh Zayed Institute for Pediatric Surgical Innovation, Children's National Medical Center, 111 Michigan Ave. DC 20010 USA.
I IordachitaLaboratory for Computational Sensing and Robotics (LCSR), John Hopkins University, 3400 N. Charles St. Baltimore MD 21218 USA.
R SzeSheikh Zayed Institute for Pediatric Surgical Innovation, Children's National Medical Center, 111 Michigan Ave. DC 20010 USA.
N M SafdarSheikh Zayed Institute for Pediatric Surgical Innovation, Children's National Medical Center, 111 Michigan Ave. DC 20010 USA.
K SharmaSheikh Zayed Institute for Pediatric Surgical Innovation, Children's National Medical Center, 111 Michigan Ave. DC 20010 USA.
S FrickeDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging and Radiology, Children's National Medical center.
A KriegerSheikh Zayed Institute for Pediatric Surgical Innovation, Children's National Medical Center, 111 Michigan Ave. DC 20010 USA.
K ClearySheikh Zayed Institute for Pediatric Surgical Innovation, Children's National Medical Center, 111 Michigan Ave. DC 20010 USA.

Funding

Pneumatic Robot for MRI-Guided Pediatrics Long Bone BiopsyR01CA172244 · NCI · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI CLEARY, KEVIN R., SZE, RAYMOND · 2013 to 2015
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA172244
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A novel compact and lightweight patient-mounted MRI-compatible robot has been designed for MRI image-guided interventions. This robot is intended to enable MRI-guided needle placement as done in shoulder arthrography. The robot could make needle placement more accurate and simplify the current workflow by converting the traditional two-stage arthrography procedure (fluoroscopy-guided needle insertion followed by a diagnostic MRI scan) to a one-stage procedure (streamlined workflow all in MRI suite). The robot has 4 degrees of freedom (DOF), two for orientation of the needle and two for needle positioning. The mechanical design was based on several criteria including rigidity, MRI compatibility, compact design, sterilizability, and adjustability. The proposed workflow is discussed and initial MRI compatibility experiments are presented. The results show that artifacts in the region of interest are minimal and that MRI images of the shoulder were not adversely affected by placing the robot on a human volunteer.

Identifiers

PMID25473653
PMCPMC4248365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.