Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25473450›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of stem cells2014

Mesengenic differentiation: comparison of human and rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells.

Arianna Scuteri, Elisabetta Donzelli, Dana Foudah, Cristina Caldara, Juliana Redondo, Giovanna D'Amico, Giovanni Tredici, Mariarosaria Miloso

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of stem cells, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Arianna ScuteriDipartimento di Chirurgia e Medicina Traslazionale, Università Milano-Bicocca, via Cadore ; NeuroMi, Milan Center for Neurosciences, Milano, Italy.
Elisabetta DonzelliDipartimento di Chirurgia e Medicina Traslazionale, Università Milano-Bicocca, via Cadore ; NeuroMi, Milan Center for Neurosciences, Milano, Italy.
Dana FoudahDipartimento di Chirurgia e Medicina Traslazionale, Università Milano-Bicocca, via Cadore.
Cristina CaldaraDipartimento di Chirurgia e Medicina Traslazionale, Università Milano-Bicocca, via Cadore.
Juliana RedondoDipartimento di Chirurgia e Medicina Traslazionale, Università Milano-Bicocca, via Cadore.
Giovanna D'AmicoCentro Ricerca Tettamanti, Clinica Pediatrica, Università Milano-Bicocca, Monza.
Giovanni TrediciDipartimento di Chirurgia e Medicina Traslazionale, Università Milano-Bicocca, via Cadore ; NeuroMi, Milan Center for Neurosciences, Milano, Italy.
Mariarosaria MilosoDipartimento di Chirurgia e Medicina Traslazionale, Università Milano-Bicocca, via Cadore ; NeuroMi, Milan Center for Neurosciences, Milano, Italy.
University of Milano-Bicocca · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesCellular therapies using Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) represent a promising approach for the treatment of degenerative diseases, in particular for mesengenic tissue regeneration. However, before the approval of clinical trials in humans, in vitro studies must be performed aimed at investigating MSCs' biology and the mechanisms regulating their proliferation and differentiation abilities. Besides studies on human MSCs (hMSCs), MSCs derived from rodents have been the most used cellular type for in vitro studies. Nevertheless, the transfer of the results obtained using animal MSCs to hMSCs has been hindered by the limited knowledge regarding the similarities existing between cells of different origins. Aim of this paper is to highlight similarities and differences and to clarify the sometimes reported different results obtained using these cells. METHODS AND

resultsWe compare the differentiation ability into mesengenic lineages of rat and human MSCs cultured in their standard conditions. Our results describe in which way the source from which MSCs are derived affects their differentiation potential, depending on the mesengenic lineage considered. For osteogenic and chondrogenic lineages, the main difference between human and rat MSCs is represented by differentiation time, while for adipogenesis hMSCs have a greater differentiation potential.

conclusionsThese results on the one hand suggest to carefully evaluate the transfer of results obtained with animal MSCs, on the other hand they offer a clue to better apply MSCs into clinical practice.

Indexed as

Adipogenic DifferentiationChondrogenic DifferentiationHumanMesenchymal Stem CellsOsteogenic DifferentiationRat

Identifiers

PMID25473450
PMCPMC4249895
OpenAlexW1977744140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.