Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25473413›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in zoology2014

Evolutionary history of Chaetognatha inferred from molecular and morphological data: a case study for body plan simplification.

Samah Gasmi, Gabriel Nève, Nicolas Pech, Saïda Tekaya, André Gilles, Yvan Perez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in zoology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A giant stem-group chaetognath.Science advances · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Tara Oceans: towards global ocean ecosystems biology.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Samah GasmiAix-Marseille Université, CNRS, IRD, Avignon Université, IMBE UMR 7263, 13331 Marseille cedex 3, France ; Université de Tunis El Manar, Faculté des Sciences de Tunis, UR11ES12 Biologie de la Reproduction et du Développement animal, 2092 El Manar, Tunis Tunisie.
Gabriel NèveAix-Marseille Université, CNRS, IRD, Avignon Université, IMBE UMR 7263, 13331 Marseille cedex 3, France.
Nicolas PechAix-Marseille Université, CNRS, IRD, Avignon Université, IMBE UMR 7263, 13331 Marseille cedex 3, France.
Saïda TekayaUniversité de Tunis El Manar, Faculté des Sciences de Tunis, UR11ES12 Biologie de la Reproduction et du Développement animal, 2092 El Manar, Tunis Tunisie.
André GillesAix-Marseille Université, CNRS, IRD, Avignon Université, IMBE UMR 7263, 13331 Marseille cedex 3, France.
Yvan PerezAix-Marseille Université, CNRS, IRD, Avignon Université, IMBE UMR 7263, 13331 Marseille cedex 3, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChaetognatha are a phylum of marine carnivorous animals which includes more than 130 extant species. The internal systematics of this group have been intensively debated since it was discovered in the 18(th) century. While they can be traced back to the earlier Cambrian, they are an extraordinarily homogeneous phylum at the morphological level - a fascinating characteristic that puzzled many a scientist who has tried to clarify their taxonomy. Recent studies which have attempted to reconstruct a phylogeny using molecular data have relied on single gene analyses and a somewhat restricted taxon sampling. Here, we present the first large scale phylogenetic study of Chaetognatha based on a combined analysis of nearly the complete ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes. We use this analysis to infer the evolution of some morphological characters. This work includes 36 extant species, mainly obtained from Tara Oceans Expedition 2009/2012, that represent 16 genera and 6 of the 9 extant families.

resultsCladistic and phenetic analysis of morphological characters, geometric morphometrics and molecular small subunit (SSU rRNA) and large subunit (LSU rRNA) ribosomal genes phylogenies provided new insights into the relationships and the evolutionary history of Chaetognatha. We propose the following clade structure for the phylum: (((Sagittidae, Krohnittidae), Spadellidae), (Eukrohniidae, Heterokrohniidae)), with the Pterosagittidae included in the Sagittidae. The clade (Sagittidae, Krohnittidae) constitutes the monophyletic order of Aphragmophora. Molecular analyses showed that the Phragmophora are paraphyletic. The Ctenodontina/Flabellodontina and Syngonata/Chorismogonata hypotheses are invalidated on the basis of both morphological and molecular data. This new phylogeny also includes resurrected and modified genera within Sagittidae.

conclusionsThe distribution of some morphological characters traditionally used in systematics and for species diagnosis suggests that the diversity in Chaetognatha was produced through a process of mosaic evolution. Moreover, chaetognaths have mostly evolved by simplification of their body plan and their history shows numerous convergent events of losses and reversions. The main morphological novelty observed is the acquisition of a second pair of lateral fins in Sagittidae, which represents an adaptation to the holoplanktonic niche.

Indexed as

Body plan simplificationChaetognathaHomoplasyPhylogeneticsProcrustes surimpositionSystematics

Identifiers

PMID25473413
PMCPMC4254178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.