Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25473300›Full record

ArticleOncoTargets and therapy2014

Continuation of bevacizumab and addition of hormone therapy following weekly paclitaxel therapy in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.

Andrés Redondo, Virginia Martínez, Pilar Zamora, Beatriz Castelo, Alvaro Pinto, Patricia Cruz, Oliver Higuera, Marta Mendiola, David Hardisson, Enrique Espinosa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in OncoTargets and therapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrés RedondoMedical Oncology Department, University Hospital La Paz (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain.
Virginia MartínezMedical Oncology Department, University Hospital La Paz (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain.
Pilar ZamoraMedical Oncology Department, University Hospital La Paz (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain.
Beatriz CasteloMedical Oncology Department, University Hospital La Paz (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain.
Alvaro PintoMedical Oncology Department, University Hospital La Paz (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain.
Patricia CruzMedical Oncology Department, University Hospital La Paz (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain.
Oliver HigueraMedical Oncology Department, University Hospital La Paz (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain.
Marta MendiolaTranslational Oncology and Molecular Pathology Laboratory, University Hospital La Paz (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain.
David HardissonPathology Department, University Hospital La Paz (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain.
Enrique EspinosaMedical Oncology Department, University Hospital La Paz (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain.
Hospital Universitario La Paz · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBevacizumab plus taxane chemotherapy improves progression-free survival (PFS) versus taxane monotherapy in the first-line treatment of HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and appears promising in the second-line setting. This retrospective analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of this combination in a real-world setting. PATIENTS AND

methodsEligible patients received bevacizumab (10 mg/kg days 1 and 15, every 28 days) plus paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2) days 1, 8, and 15, every 28 days) as first-line therapy for MBC, or as subsequent lines, including bevacizumab continuation therapy, at La Paz University Hospital between August 2007 and October 2012. End points included objective response rate (ORR), PFS, overall survival (OS), and safety.

resultsSeventy-eight patients were included. Median PFS was 12.8 months for patients receiving first-line treatment and 9.3 months for subsequent lines. Forty-five patients (57.7%) continued bevacizumab after stopping paclitaxel, and had significantly longer PFS and OS than those who did not (hazard ratio [HR] 0.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.248-0.653, P<0.001; HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.218-0.710, P=0.002; respectively). In the continuation phase, estrogen receptor-positive patients had longer PFS and OS when receiving hormone therapy plus bevacizumab versus patients receiving only bevacizumab (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.24-1.04, P=0.06; HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.16-1.16, P=0.09; respectively). Thirty-five patients (44.9%) reported grade 3-4 adverse events.

conclusionBevacizumab plus paclitaxel was effective in HER2-negative MBC. Continuation of bevacizumab and addition of hormone therapy following paclitaxel therapy could be beneficial.

Indexed as

advanced breast cancerbevacizumabfirst linehormone therapymaintenance

Identifiers

PMID25473300
PMCPMC4251573
OpenAlexW2067198949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.