ArticleMolecular pharmacology2015
Sodium ion binding pocket mutations and adenosine A2A receptor function.
Article in Molecular pharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 56 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- The role of the tryptophan-rich allosteric network and sodium egress in GPCR activation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Conformational Heterogeneity Underlying Divergent Signaling in Class A G Protein-Coupled Receptors.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025Review
- Structural basis for ligand promiscuity and high signaling activity of Kaposi's Sarcoma-associated Herpesvirus-encoded GPCR.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Single-Molecule Insights into GPCR Conformational Landscapes.The Journal of membrane biology · 2025Review
- Structure-guided design of partial agonists at an opioid receptor.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Computational design of highly signalling-active membrane receptors through solvent-mediated allosteric networks.Nature chemistry · 2025Article
- Ligand binding kinetics to evaluate the function and stability of ABiophysical journal · 2025Article
- Signaling Modulation Mediated by Ligand Water Interactions with the Sodium Site at μOR.ACS central science · 2024Article
- Monitoring GPCR conformation with GFP-inspired dyes.iScience · 2024Article
- Structure-Guided Design of Partial Agonists at an Opioid Receptor.Research square · 2024Article
- Membrane mimetic-dependence of GPCR energy landscapes.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2024Article
- Characterizing conformational states in GPCR structures using machine learning.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Cannabidiol at Nanomolar Concentrations Negatively Affects Signaling through the Adenosine AInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Single-molecule visualization of human ACommunications biology · 2023Article
- Sub-millisecond conformational dynamics of the ACommunications biology · 2023Article
- The structure, function, and pharmacology of MRGPRs.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2023Review
- Allosteric Regulation of G-Protein-Coupled Receptors: From Diversity of Molecular Mechanisms to Multiple Allosteric Sites and Their Ligands.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Cancer-Associated Mutations of the Adenosine AMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The activity of the serotonergic 5-HTThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Recently we identified a sodium ion binding pocket in a high-resolution structure of the human adenosine A2A receptor. In the present study we explored this binding site through site-directed mutagenesis and molecular dynamics simulations. Amino acids in the pocket were mutated to alanine, and their influence on agonist and antagonist affinity, allosterism by sodium ions and amilorides, and receptor functionality was explored. Mutation of the polar residues in the Na(+) pocket were shown to either abrogate (D52A(2.50) and N284A(7.49)) or reduce (S91A(3.39), W246A(6.48), and N280A(7.45)) the negative allosteric effect of sodium ions on agonist binding. Mutations D52A(2.50) and N284A(7.49) completely abolished receptor signaling, whereas mutations S91A(3.39) and N280A(7.45) elevated basal activity and mutations S91A(3.39), W246A(6.48), and N280A(7.45) decreased agonist-stimulated receptor signaling. In molecular dynamics simulations D52A(2.50) directly affected the mobility of sodium ions, which readily migrated to another pocket formed by Glu13(1.39) and His278(7.43). The D52A(2.50) mutation also decreased the potency of amiloride with respect to ligand displacement but did not change orthosteric ligand affinity. In contrast, W246A(6.48) increased some of the allosteric effects of sodium ions and amiloride, whereas orthosteric ligand binding was decreased. These new findings suggest that the sodium ion in the allosteric binding pocket not only impacts ligand affinity but also plays a vital role in receptor signaling. Because the sodium ion binding pocket is highly conserved in other class A G protein-coupled receptors, our findings may have a general relevance for these receptors and may guide the design of novel synthetic allosteric modulators or bitopic ligands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.