Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25473017›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2015

The forest or the trees: preference for global over local image processing is reversed by prior experience in honeybees.

Aurore Avarguès-Weber, Adrian G Dyer, Noha Ferrah, Martin Giurfa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Illusional Perspective across Humans and Bees.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Different mechanisms underlie implicit visual statistical learning in honey bees and humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Attention-like processes in insects.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
  19. Resources or landmarks: which factors drive homing success in Tetragonula carbonaria foraging in natural and disturbed landscapes?Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aurore Avarguès-WeberCentre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, Université de Toulouse; UPS, 118 route de Narbonne, Toulouse Cedex 9 31062, France Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, CNRS, 118 route de Narbonne, Toulouse Cedex 9 31062, France aurore.avargues-weber@univ-tlse3.fr.
Adrian G DyerDepartment of Physiology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia School of Media and Communication, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia.
Noha FerrahDepartment of Physiology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Martin GiurfaCentre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, Université de Toulouse; UPS, 118 route de Narbonne, Toulouse Cedex 9 31062, France Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, CNRS, 118 route de Narbonne, Toulouse Cedex 9 31062, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional models of insect vision have assumed that insects are only capable of low-level analysis of local cues and are incapable of global, holistic perception. However, recent studies on honeybee (Apis mellifera) vision have refuted this view by showing that this insect also processes complex visual information by using spatial configurations or relational rules. In the light of these findings, we asked whether bees prioritize global configurations or local cues by setting these two levels of image analysis in competition. We trained individual free-flying honeybees to discriminate hierarchical visual stimuli within a Y-maze and tested bees with novel stimuli in which local and/or global cues were manipulated. We demonstrate that even when local information is accessible, bees prefer global information, thus relying mainly on the object's spatial configuration rather than on elemental, local information. This preference can be reversed if bees are pre-trained to discriminate isolated local cues. In this case, bees prefer the hierarchical stimuli with the local elements previously primed even if they build an incorrect global configuration. Pre-training with local cues induces a generic attentional bias towards any local elements as local information is prioritized in the test, even if the local cues used in the test are different from the pre-trained ones. Our results thus underline the plasticity of visual processing in insects and provide new insights for the comparative analysis of visual recognition in humans and animals.

Indexed as

Recognition, PsychologyAnimalsBeesBehavior, AnimalCuesForestsPattern Recognition, VisualPhotic StimulationVisual PerceptionApis melliferaattentionhoneybeeperceptual groupingprimingvision

Identifiers

PMID25473017
PMCPMC4286040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.