Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25472882›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2016

Eye movements of patients with schizophrenia in a natural environment.

Stefan Dowiasch, Bianca Backasch, Wolfgang Einhäuser, Dirk Leube, Tilo Kircher, Frank Bremmer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Schizophrenia and Orthoptic Conditions: A Literature Review.The British and Irish orthoptic journal · 2024
    Review
  10. Movement markers of schizophrenia: a detailed analysis of patients' gait patterns.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Free visual exploration of natural movies in schizophrenia.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stefan DowiaschDepartment of Neurophysics, Philipps-University Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Straße 8a, 35043, Marburg, Germany. stefan.dowiasch@physik.uni-marburg.de.
Bianca BackaschDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Philipps-University Marburg, Rudolf-Bultmann-Straße 8, 35039, Marburg, Germany.
Wolfgang EinhäuserDepartment of Neurophysics, Philipps-University Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Straße 8a, 35043, Marburg, Germany.
Dirk LeubeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Philipps-University Marburg, Rudolf-Bultmann-Straße 8, 35039, Marburg, Germany.
Tilo KircherDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Philipps-University Marburg, Rudolf-Bultmann-Straße 8, 35039, Marburg, Germany.
Frank BremmerDepartment of Neurophysics, Philipps-University Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Straße 8a, 35043, Marburg, Germany.
Philipps University of Marburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alterations of eye movements in schizophrenia patients have been widely described for laboratory settings. For example, gain during smooth tracking is reduced, and fixation patterns differ between patients and healthy controls. The question remains, whether such results are related to the specifics of the experimental environment, or whether they transfer to natural settings. Twenty ICD-10 diagnosed schizophrenia patients and 20 healthy age-matched controls participated in the study, each performing four different oculomotor tasks corresponding to natural everyday behavior in an indoor environment: (I) fixating stationary targets, (II) sitting in a hallway with free gaze, (III) walking down the hallway, and (IV) visually tracking a target on the floor while walking straight-ahead. In all conditions, eye movements were continuously recorded binocularly by a mobile lightweight eye tracker (EyeSeeCam). When patients looked at predefined targets, they showed more fixations with reduced durations than controls. The opposite was true when participants were sitting in a hallway with free gaze. During visual tracking, patients showed a significantly greater root-mean-square error (representing the mean deviation from optimal) of retinal target velocity. Different from previous results on smooth-pursuit eye movements obtained in laboratory settings, no such difference was found for velocity gain. Taken together, we have identified significant differences in fundamental oculomotor parameters between schizophrenia patients and healthy controls during natural behavior in a real environment. Moreover, our data provide evidence that in natural settings, patients overcome some impairments, which might be present only in laboratory studies, by as of now unknown compensatory mechanisms or strategies.

Indexed as

EnvironmentAdultCase-Control StudiesEye MovementsFemaleHumansMaleOcular Motility DisordersPhotic StimulationPsychomotor PerformanceSchizophreniaVisual PerceptionYoung AdultEye movementsNatural environmentReal-world gazeSchizophreniaSelf-motion

Identifiers

PMID25472882
PMCPMC4723634
OpenAlexW2080141639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.