Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25472853›Full record

ArticleJournal of innate immunity2015

A novel pathway of cell death in response to cytosolic DNA in Drosophila cells.

Nazarii Vitak, Karyn N Johnson, David P Sester, Katryn J Stacey

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of innate immunity, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Nobel Parasites in the Kingdom of Invertebrates.Journal of innate immunity · 2016
    Article
  4. A SmallmSphere
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nazarii VitakSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld., Australia.
Karyn N Johnson
David P Sester
Katryn J Stacey
The University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Defence against invading DNA occurs in both mammals and bacteria. Recognition of stray DNA can initiate responses to infection, but may also protect against potentially mutagenic integration of transposons or retrotransposons into the genome. Double-stranded DNA detected in the cytosol of mammalian macrophages can elicit inflammatory cytokines and cell death following assembly of the AIM2 inflammasome. Amongst eukaryotes, responses to cytosolic DNA have so far only been detected in mammals, and AIM2 is mammalian restricted. In protecting genome integrity, we reasoned that pathways recognising invading DNA should be fundamental to cellular life, and that cell death would be an appropriate response to an overwhelming foreign DNA burden. We found that Drosophila S2 cells were killed by transfection of DNA from a range of natural sources. Unlike with mammalian cells, responses were not prevented by DNA denaturation. There was an element of sequence specificity, as synthetic single-stranded homopolymers were not toxic, whilst mixed-base synthetic DNA caused significant cell death. Death occurred with rapid loss of membrane integrity, and without the characteristic features of apoptosis. We have defined a novel defence against invading DNA in Drosophila. An active necrotic pathway has not previously been described in insects.

Indexed as

NecrosisAnimalsApoptosisCell LineCell MembraneCell Membrane PermeabilityCytosolDNADNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Transposable ElementsDrosophilaMolecular StructureSignal TransductionSpecies SpecificityVirus IntegrationAIM2 protein, humanDNADNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID25472853
PMCPMC6738762
OpenAlexW1975438324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.