Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25472744›Full record

ReviewJournal of the American Heart Association2014

Challenges of ascertaining national trends in the incidence of coronary heart disease in the United States.

Earl S Ford, Véronique L Roger, Shannon M Dunlay, Alan S Go, Wayne D Rosamond

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Generational Differences in Audiometric and Self-Reported Hearing and Hearing Aid Use.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Trends in Incidence and Case Fatality Rates of Heart Disease and Its Subtypes in Korea, 2006-2015.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Earl S FordDivision of Population Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (E.S.F.).
Véronique L RogerDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, RochesterMN (R., S.M.D.).
Shannon M DunlayDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, RochesterMN (R., S.M.D.).
Alan S GoDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA (A.S.G.) Departments of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA (A.S.G.) Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA (A.S.G.).
Wayne D RosamondDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (W.D.R.).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Epidemiologic Research DesignAsymptomatic DiseasesCause of DeathCoronary DiseaseData Interpretation, StatisticalEvidence-Based MedicineHospitalizationHumansIncidencePrevalencePrognosisReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexTime Factorscoronary heart diseaseincidencetrends

Identifiers

PMID25472744
PMCPMC4338697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.