Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25472681›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2014

Circulating sex hormones and terminal duct lobular unit involution of the normal breast.

Zeina G Khodr, Mark E Sherman, Ruth M Pfeiffer, Gretchen L Gierach, Louise A Brinton, Roni T Falk, Deesha A Patel, Laura M Linville, Daphne Papathomas, Susan E Clare and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Progesterone and Breast Cancer.Endocrine reviews · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Involution of breast tissue and mammographic density.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2016
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zeina G KhodrDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland.
Mark E ShermanDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland. Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland.
Ruth M PfeifferDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland.
Gretchen L GierachDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland.
Louise A BrintonDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland.
Roni T FalkDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland.
Deesha A PatelDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland.
Laura M LinvilleGeorge Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC.
Daphne PapathomasDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland.
Susan E ClareDepartment of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Daniel W VisscherDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Carolyn MiesDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Stephen M HewittApplied Molecular Pathology Laboratory, Laboratory of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Anna Maria V StornioloSusan G. Komen Tissue Bank at the Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Adrian RosebrockComputer Science and Electrical Engineering Department, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland.
Jesus J CabanNational Intrepid Center of Excellence, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland.
Jonine D FigueroaDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland. FigueroaJ@mail.nih.gov.
George Washington University · USMayo Clinic · US

Funding

Hormone-Related CancersZIACP010126 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI GIERACH, GRETCHEN · 2009 to 2025
$103.5M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA CP010126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTerminal duct lobular units (TDLU) are the predominant source of breast cancers. Lesser degrees of age-related TDLU involution have been associated with increased breast cancer risk, but factors that influence involution are largely unknown. We assessed whether circulating hormones, implicated in breast cancer risk, are associated with levels of TDLU involution using data from the Susan G. Komen Tissue Bank (KTB) at the Indiana University Simon Cancer Center (2009-2011).

methodsWe evaluated three highly reproducible measures of TDLU involution, using normal breast tissue samples from the KTB (n = 390): TDLU counts, median TDLU span, and median acini counts per TDLU. RRs (for continuous measures), ORs (for categorical measures), 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), and Ptrends were calculated to assess the association between tertiles of estradiol, testosterone, sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), progesterone, and prolactin with TDLU measures. All models were stratified by menopausal status and adjusted for confounders.

resultsAmong premenopausal women, higher prolactin levels were associated with higher TDLU counts (RRT3vsT1:1.18; 95% CI: 1.07-1.31; Ptrend = 0.0005), but higher progesterone was associated with lower TDLU counts (RRT3vsT1: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.72-0.89; Ptrend < 0.0001). Among postmenopausal women, higher levels of estradiol (RRT3vsT1:1.61; 95% CI: 1.32-1.97; Ptrend < 0.0001) and testosterone (RRT3vsT1: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.09-1.59; Ptrend = 0.0043) were associated with higher TDLU counts.

conclusionsThese data suggest that select hormones may influence breast cancer risk potentially through delaying TDLU involution. IMPACT: Increased understanding of the relationship between circulating markers and TDLU involution may offer new insights into breast carcinogenesis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 23(12); 2765-73. ©2014 AACR.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreastBreast NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGonadal Steroid HormonesHumansMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSex Hormone-Binding GlobulinYoung AdultGonadal Steroid HormonesSex Hormone-Binding Globulin

Identifiers

PMID25472681
PMCPMC4333643
OpenAlexW2105032076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.