Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25472635›Full record

ArticleJournal of epidemiology and community health2015

The effect of participatory women's groups on infant feeding and child health knowledge, behaviour and outcomes in rural Bangladesh: a controlled before-and-after study.

Leila Younes, Tanja A J Houweling, Kishwar Azad, Abdul Kuddus, Sanjit Shaha, Bedowra Haq, Tasmin Nahar, Munir Hossen, James Beard, Andrew Copas and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of epidemiology and community health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Leila YounesUCL Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Tanja A J HouwelingUCL Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK Department of Public Health, ErasmusMC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Kishwar AzadPerinatal Care Project (PCP), Diabetic Association of Bangladesh (BADAS), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Abdul KuddusPerinatal Care Project (PCP), Diabetic Association of Bangladesh (BADAS), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Sanjit ShahaPerinatal Care Project (PCP), Diabetic Association of Bangladesh (BADAS), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Bedowra HaqPerinatal Care Project (PCP), Diabetic Association of Bangladesh (BADAS), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Tasmin NaharPerinatal Care Project (PCP), Diabetic Association of Bangladesh (BADAS), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Munir HossenPerinatal Care Project (PCP), Diabetic Association of Bangladesh (BADAS), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
James BeardUCL Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Andrew CopasDepartment of Infection and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
Audrey ProstUCL Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Anthony CostelloUCL Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Edward FottrellUCL Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 085417Wellcome Trust 085417ma/Z/08/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite efforts to reduce under-5 mortality rates worldwide, an estimated 6.6 million under-5 children die every year. Community mobilisation through participatory women's groups has been shown to improve maternal and newborn health in rural settings, but little is known about the potential of this approach to improve care and health in children after the newborn period.

methodsFollowing on from a cluster-randomised controlled trial to assess the effect of participatory women's groups on maternal and neonatal health outcomes in rural Bangladesh, 162 women's groups continued to meet between April 2010 and December 2011 to identify, prioritise and address issues that affect the health of children under 5 years. A controlled before-and-after study design and difference-in-difference analysis was used to assess morbidity outcomes and changes in knowledge and practices related to child feeding, hygiene and care-seeking behaviour.

findingsSignificant improvements were measured in mothers' knowledge of disease prevention and management, danger signs and hand washing at critical times. Significant increases were seen in exclusive breast feeding for at least 6 months (15.3% (4.2% to 26.5%)), and mean duration of breast feeding (37.9 days (17.4 to 58.3)). Maternal reports of under-5 morbidities fell in intervention compared with control areas, including reports of fever (-10.5% (-15.1% to -6.0%)) and acute respiratory infections (-12.2% (-15.6% to -8.8%)). No differences were observed in dietary diversity scores or immunisation uptake.

conclusionsCommunity mobilisation through participatory women's groups can be successfully adapted to address health knowledge and practice in relation to child's health, leading to improvements in a number of child health indicators and behaviours.

Indexed as

Child HealthHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeInfant HealthAdolescentAdultBangladeshBreast FeedingChild Nutrition SciencesChild, PreschoolCommunity ParticipationControlled Before-After StudiesEducational StatusFemaleHumansInfantMaleBangladeshCommunity MobilisationParticipatory Women's GroupsRural Areas

Identifiers

PMID25472635
PMCPMC4392217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.