ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2015
Physician counseling on colorectal cancer screening and receipt of screening among Latino patients.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of provider-patient communication on cancer screening adherence: A systematic review.Preventive medicine · 2016Pooled it
- Navigating Language Barriers: A Systematic Review of Patient Navigators' Impact on Cancer Screening for Limited English Proficient Patients.Journal of general internal medicine · 2016Pooled it
- Physician Intervention and Chinese Americans' Colorectal Cancer Screening.American journal of health behavior · 2018Trial
- Use of patient-reported experience and outcome measures within the colorectal cancer care continuum: a scoping review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2025Article
- Patient-Provider Communication and Colorectal Cancer Screening Completion Using Multi-target Stool DNA Testing.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025Article
- Teaching Preclinical Medical Students Lifestyle Counseling Skills for Patients' Health Behavior Change.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2024Article
- Article
- Closing the Gap: Participatory Formative Evaluation to Reduce Cancer Screening Disparities among Patients with Limited English Proficiency.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021Review
- Intention for Screening Colonoscopy among Previous Non-Participants: Results of a Representative Cross-Sectional Study in Germany.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Lower Adherence: A Description of Colorectal Cancer Screening Barrier Talk.Journal of health communication · 2020Observational
- Patterns and Trends in Cancer Screening in the United States.Preventing chronic disease · 2018Article
- Colorectal Cancer Screening in Vulnerable Patients: Promoting Informed and Shared Decisions.American journal of preventive medicine · 2016Article
- Perceptions of Risk for Hepatitis B Infection among the Hmong.Hmong studies journal · 2016Article
- Capsule commentary on Nápoles et. al, Physician counseling on colorectal cancer screening and receipt of screening among Latino patients.Journal of general internal medicine · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLatinos have lower rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and later stage diagnosis than Whites, which may be partially explained by physician communication factors.
objectiveWe assessed associations between patient-reported physician counseling regarding CRC screening and receipt of CRC screening among Latino primary care patients.
designThis was a cross-sectional telephone survey.
participantsThe participants of this study were Latino primary care patients 50 years of age or older, with one or more visits during the preceding year. MAIN MEASURES: We developed patient-reported measures to assess whether physicians provided explanations of CRC risks and tests, elicited patients' barriers to CRC screening, were responsive to patients' concerns about screening, and encouraged patients to be screened. Outcomes were patient reports of receipt of endoscopy (sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy) and fecal occult blood test (FOBT) within recommended guidelines. KEY
resultsOf 817 eligible patients contacted, 505 (62 %) completed the survey; mean age was 61 years (SD 8.4), 69 % were women, and 53 % had less than high school education. Forty-six percent reported obtaining endoscopy (with or without FOBT), 13 % reported FOBT only, and 41 % reported no CRC screening. In bivariate analyses, physician explanations, elicitation of barriers, responsiveness to concerns, and greater encouragement for screening were associated with receipt of endoscopy (p < 0.001), and explanations (p < 0.05) and encouragement (p < 0.001) were associated with FOBT. Adjusting for covariates, physician explanations (OR = 1.27; 95 % CI 1.03, 1.58) and greater physician encouragement (OR = 6.74; 95 % CI 3.57, 12.72) were associated with endoscopy; patients reporting quite a bit/a lot of physician encouragement had six times higher odds of obtaining the FOBT as those reporting none/a little encouragement (OR = 6.54; 95 % CI 2.76, 15.48).
conclusionsAmong primarily lower-socioeconomic status Latino patients, the degree to which patients perceived that physicians encouraged CRC screening was more strongly associated with screening than with providing risk information, eliciting barriers, and responding to their concerns about screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.