Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25472004›Full record

SynthesisDisability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology2016

A review of factors influencing participation in social and community activities for wheelchair users.

Emma M Smith, Brodie M Sakakibara, William C Miller

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 133 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emma M Smitha Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, University of British Columbia , Vancouver , BC , Canada .
Brodie M Sakakibarab Faculty of Health Sciences , Simon Fraser University , Vancouver , BC , Canada and.
William C Millera Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, University of British Columbia , Vancouver , BC , Canada .
University of British Columbia · CASimon Fraser University · CA

Funding

CIHR 100925-1CIHR 107848-1CIHR AMG-100925CIHR IAP-107848
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo systematically identify factors associated with participation in social and community activities for adult wheelchair users (WCUs). DATA SOURCES: PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and EMBASE. STUDY SELECTION: Quantitative and qualitative peer-reviewed publications were included, which were written in English, reported original research and investigated factors associated with social and community participation in adult WCUs. DATA EXTRACTION: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were used. Factors were organized using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). DATA SYNTHESIS: Thirty-five studies were selected: two of power WCUs, 10 of manual WCUs and 23 of both. Six qualitative studies, ranging in quality from 8/10 to 9/10 and 29 quantitative studies were included, ranging in quality from 4/15 to 11/15. Fifteen body function, 4 activity, 5 participation, 15 environmental and 14 personal factors were found to be associated with social and community participation.

conclusionsSocial and community participation of WCUs is associated with factors from all ICF domains. Wheelchair factors, accessibility, skills with wheelchair use, pain, finances and education are modifiable factors frequently reported to be associated with participation. Experimental research focusing on modifiable factors is needed to further our understanding of factors influencing participation among WCUs. Implications for Rehabilitation Wheelchair factors, including comfort and durability, are associated with participation and may be targeted in clinical intervention. Wheelchair skills are clinically modifiable and have been shown to improve participation in manual wheelchair users. Body functions (e.g. confidence, depression and fatigue) and personal factors (e.g. finances and level of education) may be considered for clinical intervention.

Indexed as

EnvironmentSocial ParticipationElectric Power SuppliesHumansInterpersonal RelationsMobility LimitationPersons with DisabilitiesQuality of LifeSelf ConceptSocioeconomic FactorsWheelchairsCommunity integrationexperimental researchleisure activitiessocial participationsystematic reviewwheelchairs

Identifiers

PMID25472004
PMCPMC4581875
OpenAlexW2114705609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.